mutter/tests
Robert Bragg e9f721216e Add _primitive_draw to replace _framebuffer_draw_primitive
When splitting out the CoglPath api we saw that we would be left with
inconsistent drawing apis if the drawing apis in core Cogl were lumped
into the cogl_framebuffer_ api considering other Cogl sub-libraries or
that others will want to create higher level drawing apis outside of
Cogl but can't use the same namespace.

So that we can aim for a more consistent style this adds a
cogl_primitive_draw() api, comparable to cogl_path_fill() or
cogl_pango_show_layout() that's intended to replace
cogl_framebuffer_draw_primitive()

Note: the attribute and rectangle drawing apis are still in the
cogl_framebuffer_ namespace and this might potentially change but in
these cases there is no single object representing the thing being drawn
so it seems a more reasonable they they live in the framebuffer
namespace for now.

Note: the cogl_framebuffer_draw_primitive() api isn't removed by this
patch so it can more conveniently be cherry picked to the 1.16 branch so
we can mark it deprecated for a short while. Even though it's marked as
experimental api we know that there are people using the api so we'd
like to give them a chance to switch to the new api.

Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 418912b93ff81a47f9b38114d05335ab76277c48)

Conflicts:
	cogl-pango/cogl-pango-display-list.c
	cogl/Makefile.am
	cogl/cogl-framebuffer.c
	cogl/cogl-pipeline-layer-state.h
	cogl/cogl2-path.c
	cogl/driver/gl/cogl-clip-stack-gl.c
2013-07-29 18:31:36 +01:00
..
conform Add _primitive_draw to replace _framebuffer_draw_primitive 2013-07-29 18:31:36 +01:00
data Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00
micro-perf Add $(LIBM) to the LDADD for all of the examples and tests 2013-04-23 18:32:47 +01:00
unit Don't include cogl/cogl.h from test-utils.h 2013-07-04 11:50:31 +01:00
config.env.in tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00
Makefile.am Install conformance tests 2013-07-09 22:52:50 +01:00
README Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00
run-tests.sh Set G_DEBUG=fatal-warnings in run-tests.sh 2013-06-21 14:18:40 +01:00
test-launcher.sh tests: Adds our first white-box unit test 2013-06-06 21:27:16 +01:00

Outline of test categories:

The conform/ tests:
-------------------
These tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single
feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more
details.

Although it may seem a bit awkward; all the tests are built into a
single binary because it makes building the tests *much* faster by avoiding
lots of linking.

Each test has a wrapper script generated though so running the individual tests
should be convenient enough. Running the wrapper script will also print out for
convenience how you could run the test under gdb or valgrind like this for
example:

  NOTE: For debugging purposes, you can run this single test as follows:
  $ libtool --mode=execute \
            gdb --eval-command="b test_cogl_depth_test" \
            --args ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test
  or:
  $ env G_SLICE=always-malloc \
    libtool --mode=execute \
            valgrind ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test

By default the conformance tests are run offscreen. This makes the tests run
much faster and they also don't interfere with other work you may want to do by
constantly stealing focus. CoglOnscreen framebuffers obviously don't get tested
this way so it's important that the tests also get run onscreen every once in a
while, especially if changes are being made to CoglFramebuffer related code.
Onscreen testing can be enabled by setting COGL_TEST_ONSCREEN=1 in your
environment.

The micro-bench/ tests:
-----------------------
These should be focused performance tests, ideally testing a
single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetic and if you
are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably
don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you
use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and
need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is
no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear
feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then
the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging.

The data/ directory:
--------------------
This contains optional data (like images) that can be referenced by a test.


Misc notes:
-----------
• All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source
explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work,
and possibly a rationale for the approach taken for testing.

• When running tests under Valgrind, you should follow the instructions
available here:

        http://live.gnome.org/Valgrind

and also use the suppression file available inside the data/ directory.