2e6397c391
ClutterLayoutManager does not have any state associated with it, and defers all the state to its sub-classes. The BoxLayout is thus in charge of controlling: • whether or not animations should be used • the duration of the animation • the easing mode of the animation By adding three new properties: • ClutterBoxLayout:use-animations • ClutterBoxLayout:easing-duration • ClutterBoxLayout:easing-mode And their relative accessors pairs we can make BoxLayout decide whether or not, and with which parameters, call the begin_animation() method of ClutterLayoutManager. The test-box-layout has been modified to reflect this new functionality, by checking the key-press event for the 'a' key symbol to toggle the use of animations. |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
conform | ||
data | ||
interactive | ||
micro-bench | ||
tools | ||
Makefile.am | ||
README |
Outline of test categories: The conform/ tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more details. The micro-bench/ tests should be focused perfomance test, ideally testing a single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetec and if you are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging. The interactive/ tests are any tests whos status can not be determined without a user looking at some visual output, or providing some manual input etc. This covers most of the original Clutter tests. Ideally some of these tests will be migrated into the conformance/ directory so they can be used in automated nightly tests. Other notes: All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work, and possibly a rationale for the approach taken for testing.