mutter/tests
Neil Roberts 19ccb72b80 cogl-gles2-context: Wrap glCopyTex{Sub,}Image2D to flip the result
When the CoglGLES2Context is bound to read from a CoglOffscreen then
the result will be upside down from what GL expects if
glCopyTexImage2D is used directly. To fix that, this patch now wraps
glCopyTexImage2D and glCopyTexSubImage2D so that the copy is doing by
binding an FBO to the target texture and then rendering a quad
sampling from the texture in the offscreen framebuffer.

The rendering is done using the Cogl context rather than the GLES2
context because otherwise it would have to do a fair bit of work to
try and stash the old state on the context before setting up the state
to do the blit. The down side of this is that the contexts need to be
synchronized so that the rendering will be up-to-date. As far as I
understand from the GL spec, this requires a glFinish and then the
texture needs to be rebound in the new context because updates to
shared objects are guaranteed to be reflected until the object is
rebound.

GLES2 supports using glCopyTexImage2D for cube map textures. As Cogl
doesn't currently have support for cube maps, it is quite hard to get
that to work with this patch. For now attempts to copy to a cube map
texture will just be sliently ignored.

This patch also includes a test case which renders an image to the
framebuffer and then copies it to a texture. The texture is then
rendered back to the framebuffer and the contents are checked for the
correct orientation using glReadPixels.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 30b6da8134bad95267265e26685c7475f6c351c9)
2012-08-15 13:46:20 +01:00
..
conform cogl-gles2-context: Wrap glCopyTex{Sub,}Image2D to flip the result 2012-08-15 13:46:20 +01:00
data Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00
micro-perf tests: Adds journal micro benchmark 2012-08-06 14:27:39 +01:00
Makefile.am Fixes for make dist 2012-08-06 14:27:40 +01:00
README Starts porting Cogl conformance tests from Clutter 2011-09-08 15:48:07 +01:00

Outline of test categories:

The conform/ tests:
-------------------
These tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single
feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more
details.

Although it may seem a bit awkward; all the tests are built into a
single binary because it makes building the tests *much* faster by avoiding
lots of linking.

Each test has a wrapper script generated though so running the individual tests
should be convenient enough. Running the wrapper script will also print out for
convenience how you could run the test under gdb or valgrind like this for
example:

  NOTE: For debugging purposes, you can run this single test as follows:
  $ libtool --mode=execute \
            gdb --eval-command="b test_cogl_depth_test" \
            --args ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test
  or:
  $ env G_SLICE=always-malloc \
    libtool --mode=execute \
            valgrind ./test-conformance -p /conform/cogl/test_cogl_depth_test

By default the conformance tests are run offscreen. This makes the tests run
much faster and they also don't interfere with other work you may want to do by
constantly stealing focus. CoglOnscreen framebuffers obviously don't get tested
this way so it's important that the tests also get run onscreen every once in a
while, especially if changes are being made to CoglFramebuffer related code.
Onscreen testing can be enabled by setting COGL_TEST_ONSCREEN=1 in your
environment.

The micro-bench/ tests:
-----------------------
These should be focused performance tests, ideally testing a
single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetic and if you
are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably
don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you
use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and
need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is
no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear
feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then
the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging.

The data/ directory:
--------------------
This contains optional data (like images) that can be referenced by a test.


Misc notes:
-----------
• All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source
explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work,
and possibly a rationale for the approach taken for testing.

• When running tests under Valgrind, you should follow the instructions
available here:

        http://live.gnome.org/Valgrind

and also use the suppression file available inside the data/ directory.