mutter/cogl/tesselator/geom.c
Neil Roberts b86e330957 cogl: Pull in the code for GLU tesselator from Mesa/SGI
This copies the files for the GLU tesselator from Mesa. The Mesa code
is based on the original SGI code and is released under a BSD license.

The memalloc.h header has been replaced with one that forces the code
to use g_malloc and friends. The rest of the files are not altered
from the original so it should be possible to later upgrade the files
by simply overwriting them.

There is a tesselator.h header which is expected to be included by
rest of Cogl to use the tesselator. This contains a trimmed down
version of glu.h that only includes parts that pertain to the
tesselator. There is also a stub glu.h in the GL directory which is
just provided so that the tesselator code can include <GL/gl.h>
without depending on the system header. It just redirects to
tesselator.h
2010-06-29 20:37:13 +01:00

265 lines
8.7 KiB
C

/*
* SGI FREE SOFTWARE LICENSE B (Version 2.0, Sept. 18, 2008)
* Copyright (C) 1991-2000 Silicon Graphics, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
*
* Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a
* copy of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"),
* to deal in the Software without restriction, including without limitation
* the rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense,
* and/or sell copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the
* Software is furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions:
*
* The above copyright notice including the dates of first publication and
* either this permission notice or a reference to
* http://oss.sgi.com/projects/FreeB/
* shall be included in all copies or substantial portions of the Software.
*
* THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS
* OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY,
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL
* SILICON GRAPHICS, INC. BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER LIABILITY,
* WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, OUT OF
* OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE
* SOFTWARE.
*
* Except as contained in this notice, the name of Silicon Graphics, Inc.
* shall not be used in advertising or otherwise to promote the sale, use or
* other dealings in this Software without prior written authorization from
* Silicon Graphics, Inc.
*/
/*
** Author: Eric Veach, July 1994.
**
*/
#include "gluos.h"
#include <assert.h>
#include "mesh.h"
#include "geom.h"
int __gl_vertLeq( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v )
{
/* Returns TRUE if u is lexicographically <= v. */
return VertLeq( u, v );
}
GLdouble __gl_edgeEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Given three vertices u,v,w such that VertLeq(u,v) && VertLeq(v,w),
* evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v.
* Returns v->t - (uw)(v->s), ie. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes thru v), the result is zero.
*
* The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v
* is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->t = 0 and
* let r be the negated result (this evaluates (uw)(v->s)), then
* r is guaranteed to satisfy MIN(u->t,w->t) <= r <= MAX(u->t,w->t).
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( VertLeq( u, v ) && VertLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->s - u->s;
gapR = w->s - v->s;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
if( gapL < gapR ) {
return (v->t - u->t) + (u->t - w->t) * (gapL / (gapL + gapR));
} else {
return (v->t - w->t) + (w->t - u->t) * (gapR / (gapL + gapR));
}
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
GLdouble __gl_edgeSign( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Returns a number whose sign matches EdgeEval(u,v,w) but which
* is cheaper to evaluate. Returns > 0, == 0 , or < 0
* as v is above, on, or below the edge uw.
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( VertLeq( u, v ) && VertLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->s - u->s;
gapR = w->s - v->s;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
return (v->t - w->t) * gapL + (v->t - u->t) * gapR;
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
/***********************************************************************
* Define versions of EdgeSign, EdgeEval with s and t transposed.
*/
GLdouble __gl_transEval( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Given three vertices u,v,w such that TransLeq(u,v) && TransLeq(v,w),
* evaluates the t-coord of the edge uw at the s-coord of the vertex v.
* Returns v->s - (uw)(v->t), ie. the signed distance from uw to v.
* If uw is vertical (and thus passes thru v), the result is zero.
*
* The calculation is extremely accurate and stable, even when v
* is very close to u or w. In particular if we set v->s = 0 and
* let r be the negated result (this evaluates (uw)(v->t)), then
* r is guaranteed to satisfy MIN(u->s,w->s) <= r <= MAX(u->s,w->s).
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( TransLeq( u, v ) && TransLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->t - u->t;
gapR = w->t - v->t;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
if( gapL < gapR ) {
return (v->s - u->s) + (u->s - w->s) * (gapL / (gapL + gapR));
} else {
return (v->s - w->s) + (w->s - u->s) * (gapR / (gapL + gapR));
}
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
GLdouble __gl_transSign( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* Returns a number whose sign matches TransEval(u,v,w) but which
* is cheaper to evaluate. Returns > 0, == 0 , or < 0
* as v is above, on, or below the edge uw.
*/
GLdouble gapL, gapR;
assert( TransLeq( u, v ) && TransLeq( v, w ));
gapL = v->t - u->t;
gapR = w->t - v->t;
if( gapL + gapR > 0 ) {
return (v->s - w->s) * gapL + (v->s - u->s) * gapR;
}
/* vertical line */
return 0;
}
int __gl_vertCCW( GLUvertex *u, GLUvertex *v, GLUvertex *w )
{
/* For almost-degenerate situations, the results are not reliable.
* Unless the floating-point arithmetic can be performed without
* rounding errors, *any* implementation will give incorrect results
* on some degenerate inputs, so the client must have some way to
* handle this situation.
*/
return (u->s*(v->t - w->t) + v->s*(w->t - u->t) + w->s*(u->t - v->t)) >= 0;
}
/* Given parameters a,x,b,y returns the value (b*x+a*y)/(a+b),
* or (x+y)/2 if a==b==0. It requires that a,b >= 0, and enforces
* this in the rare case that one argument is slightly negative.
* The implementation is extremely stable numerically.
* In particular it guarantees that the result r satisfies
* MIN(x,y) <= r <= MAX(x,y), and the results are very accurate
* even when a and b differ greatly in magnitude.
*/
#define RealInterpolate(a,x,b,y) \
(a = (a < 0) ? 0 : a, b = (b < 0) ? 0 : b, \
((a <= b) ? ((b == 0) ? ((x+y) / 2) \
: (x + (y-x) * (a/(a+b)))) \
: (y + (x-y) * (b/(a+b)))))
#ifndef FOR_TRITE_TEST_PROGRAM
#define Interpolate(a,x,b,y) RealInterpolate(a,x,b,y)
#else
/* Claim: the ONLY property the sweep algorithm relies on is that
* MIN(x,y) <= r <= MAX(x,y). This is a nasty way to test that.
*/
#include <stdlib.h>
extern int RandomInterpolate;
GLdouble Interpolate( GLdouble a, GLdouble x, GLdouble b, GLdouble y)
{
printf("*********************%d\n",RandomInterpolate);
if( RandomInterpolate ) {
a = 1.2 * drand48() - 0.1;
a = (a < 0) ? 0 : ((a > 1) ? 1 : a);
b = 1.0 - a;
}
return RealInterpolate(a,x,b,y);
}
#endif
#define Swap(a,b) if (1) { GLUvertex *t = a; a = b; b = t; } else
void __gl_edgeIntersect( GLUvertex *o1, GLUvertex *d1,
GLUvertex *o2, GLUvertex *d2,
GLUvertex *v )
/* Given edges (o1,d1) and (o2,d2), compute their point of intersection.
* The computed point is guaranteed to lie in the intersection of the
* bounding rectangles defined by each edge.
*/
{
GLdouble z1, z2;
/* This is certainly not the most efficient way to find the intersection
* of two line segments, but it is very numerically stable.
*
* Strategy: find the two middle vertices in the VertLeq ordering,
* and interpolate the intersection s-value from these. Then repeat
* using the TransLeq ordering to find the intersection t-value.
*/
if( ! VertLeq( o1, d1 )) { Swap( o1, d1 ); }
if( ! VertLeq( o2, d2 )) { Swap( o2, d2 ); }
if( ! VertLeq( o1, o2 )) { Swap( o1, o2 ); Swap( d1, d2 ); }
if( ! VertLeq( o2, d1 )) {
/* Technically, no intersection -- do our best */
v->s = (o2->s + d1->s) / 2;
} else if( VertLeq( d1, d2 )) {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d1 */
z1 = EdgeEval( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = EdgeEval( o2, d1, d2 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->s = Interpolate( z1, o2->s, z2, d1->s );
} else {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d2 */
z1 = EdgeSign( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = -EdgeSign( o1, d2, d1 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->s = Interpolate( z1, o2->s, z2, d2->s );
}
/* Now repeat the process for t */
if( ! TransLeq( o1, d1 )) { Swap( o1, d1 ); }
if( ! TransLeq( o2, d2 )) { Swap( o2, d2 ); }
if( ! TransLeq( o1, o2 )) { Swap( o1, o2 ); Swap( d1, d2 ); }
if( ! TransLeq( o2, d1 )) {
/* Technically, no intersection -- do our best */
v->t = (o2->t + d1->t) / 2;
} else if( TransLeq( d1, d2 )) {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d1 */
z1 = TransEval( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = TransEval( o2, d1, d2 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->t = Interpolate( z1, o2->t, z2, d1->t );
} else {
/* Interpolate between o2 and d2 */
z1 = TransSign( o1, o2, d1 );
z2 = -TransSign( o1, d2, d1 );
if( z1+z2 < 0 ) { z1 = -z1; z2 = -z2; }
v->t = Interpolate( z1, o2->t, z2, d2->t );
}
}