As elsewhere, make sure objects that need to have a ownership up to the
context, and use this ownership chain to find relevant components, such
as the backend or the Wayland compositor object instance.
wayland/data-device: Hook up data devices to seats
They are tied to a seat - make that connection in struct fields too, so
that related objects can get to the context via it.
wayland: Don't get Wayland compositor via singleton getter
This means via the ownership chain or equivalent.
xwayland: Hook up manager to Wayland compositor
Same applies to the drag-n-drop struct.
xwayland: Make X11 event handling compositor instance aware
This avoids finding it via singletons in the callee.
xwayland: Don't get Wayland compositor from singleton
xwayland: Pass manager when handling dnd event
window/xwayland: Don't get Wayland compositor from singleton
xwayland/grab-keyboard: Don't get backend from singleton
xwayland: Don't get backend from singleton
wayland: Always get the backend from the context
This means traveling up the ownership chain or equivalent when
necessary.
wayland: Hook up data devices, offers and sources to the compositor
This allows tying them to a context without going through any
singletons.
wayland: Don't get display from singleton
xwayland: Don't get display from singleton
tablet: Don't get display from singleton
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2718>
For X11 grabs, the pattern matching mechanism would simply ignore
applications which have neither WM_CLASS nor WM_NAME set.
When dealing with an override redirect window however, it is not
uncommon that these window have neither value set as these window are
supposed to be ignored by the window manager.
When the WM_CLASS or the WM_NAME is not set by the client, assume the
value is empty so the pattern matching can allow for these.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1249
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1254>
This is inspired by 98892391d764d1cf where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.
A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.
No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
To emulate X11 grabs, mutter as a Wayland compositor would disable its
own keyboard shortcuts and when the X11 window is an override redirect
window (which never receives focus), it also forces keyboard focus onto
that X11 O-R window so that all keyboard events are routed to the
window, just like an X11 server would.
But that's a bit of a “all-or-nothing” approach which prevents
applications that would legitimately grab the keyboard under X11 (like
virtual machine viewers) to work by default.
Change “xwayland-allow-grabs” to control whether the keyboard focus
should be locked onto override redirect windows in case of an X11 grab.
For stringent needs, careful users can still use the blacklisting
feature (i.e. a list containing “!*”) to prevent grabs from any X11
applications to affect other Wayland native applications.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/597
If the surface is gone before `meta_xwayland_keyboard_grab_end()` is
called, we would bail out early leaving an empty grab, which will cause
a segfault as soon as a key is pressed later on.
Make sure we clean up the keyboard grab even if the surface is gone.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/255
This protocol is limited to Xwayland only and is not visible/usable by
any other client.
Mutter uses the following mechanisms to determine if an X11 client
should be granted a grab:
- is "xwayland-allow-grabs" set?
- if set, is the client blacklisted?
- otherwise, has the client set the X11 window property
_XWAYLAND_MAY_GRAB_KEYBOARD on the window using a client message?
- if not, is it a client white-listed either via the default system
list or the settings "xwayland-grab-access-rules"?
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783342
