This is no longer necessary to prevent the bits we wanted to be
prevented by the presence of this grab. We can drop this, and
let it work through the MetaWaylandPointerGrab interface.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2683>
As elsewhere, make sure objects that need to have a ownership up to the
context, and use this ownership chain to find relevant components, such
as the backend or the Wayland compositor object instance.
wayland/data-device: Hook up data devices to seats
They are tied to a seat - make that connection in struct fields too, so
that related objects can get to the context via it.
wayland: Don't get Wayland compositor via singleton getter
This means via the ownership chain or equivalent.
xwayland: Hook up manager to Wayland compositor
Same applies to the drag-n-drop struct.
xwayland: Make X11 event handling compositor instance aware
This avoids finding it via singletons in the callee.
xwayland: Don't get Wayland compositor from singleton
xwayland: Pass manager when handling dnd event
window/xwayland: Don't get Wayland compositor from singleton
xwayland/grab-keyboard: Don't get backend from singleton
xwayland: Don't get backend from singleton
wayland: Always get the backend from the context
This means traveling up the ownership chain or equivalent when
necessary.
wayland: Hook up data devices, offers and sources to the compositor
This allows tying them to a context without going through any
singletons.
wayland: Don't get display from singleton
xwayland: Don't get display from singleton
tablet: Don't get display from singleton
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/2718>
Getting crossing events is necessary between client surfaces while
there is a popup grab in effect (e.g. allow press-drag-release in
menus), we should only stick with the focus surface while the pointer
is outside any client surface.
This partially undoes commit 79050004b0 (or, at least, mutter no
longer fixes the bug it claimed to fix). This will be addressed in
gtk4.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1885>
Event delivery with grabbing popups stay essentially the same within
the grabbing client, we still must honor the implicit grab as long as
there is one.
This is however not the case, the popup_grab_focus() function ignores
the button state. The popup_grab_button() function will already indirectly
re-sync the focus surface after the last button is released, so checking
for button state in popup_grab_focus() is sufficient to make the implicit
grab honored with popup grabs involved.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1275https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1270
The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
Dismiss the popup when the grab is cancelled, so that if the grab is
ended for whatever reason (such as VT switching or the last pointer
being disconnected), it doesn't try to end the grab when it isn't
active.
This fixes a crash when VT switching back and forth while a popup grab
is active.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771858
Make the caller of focus setting check whether there is a pointer to
update the focus state of. It makes it more obvious what to expect, as
the call would be a no-op in when no pointer is present.
Grabbing is still allowed without the presence of a pointer because it
is used by popups even on touch-only systems.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771646
Make the caller of focus setting and grab starting check whether there
is a keyboard to update the focus state or start grabbing. It makes it
more obvious what to expect, as the call would be a no-op in when no
keyboard is present.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=771646
Instead of relying on destroy signals attached to the corresponding
role object, let the roles explicitly dismiss the popup when it should
be dismissed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763431
Add a bridge between the MetaWaylandPopup object and the corresponding
popup surface role. This bridge replaces communicating dismissed and
unmapped popup events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763431
If a client creates an xdg_popup given a parent that is a xdg_popup that
is not the most top one in the grab chain, send the
not_the_topmost_popup error.
Also fail a client who destroys a popup that is not the top most one.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744452
We'll want to expose popup logic outside of meta-wayland-pointer.c and
one day we'll also probably want to add touch support for popups, so
lets move it to its own file. There are no significant semantical
changes, only refactoring.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744452
