get_outer_rect now returns the visible region, and a new get_input_rect
method returns the boundaries of the full frame, including the possible
invisible regions. When undecorated, both do the samething.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
There were actually *two* MetaFrameGeometry structs: one in theme-private.h,
one in frame.h. The latter public struct was populated by a mix of (void*)
casting and int pointers, usually pulling directly from the data in the private
struct.
Remove the public struct, replace it with MetaFrameBorders and scrap all
the pointer hacks to populate it, instead relying on both structs being used
in common code.
This commit should be relatively straightforward, and it should not do any
tricky logic at all, just a sophisticated find and replace.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
In preparation for switching to handling the output shape purely by what we
paint, stop applying a shape to the frame of the window. Even when we restore
handling the output shape, this will change the behavior with respect to input;
transparent areas between the frame and the contents will stop clicks rather
than passing them through, but that is arguably at least as expected
considering how that we decorate shaped windows with a frame all around.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644930
When detaching/attaching a dialog, we were only updating
appears-focused on the parent if the child itself was focused, but in
fact, we need to do it if the child has an attached child which is
focused too.
To simplify the case of detaching a focused subtree from its parent,
we change meta_window_propagate_focus_appearance() to use
@window->display->focus_window as the window to add/remove as the
attached_focus_window, and @window only as the starting point to
propagate from. That way we can propagate focus-removal up to
@window's (soon-to-be-ex-)ancestors without having to remove it from
its descendants as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647712
Don't set a window's xtransient_for if it would create a loop. Since
this is the only place we ever set xtransient_for, we can therefore
assume everywhere else that it does not loop.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647712
Since version 3.0, GTK+ has support for style variants. At the moment,
themes may provide a dark variant, which can be requested by
applications via GtkSettings. The requested variant is exported to
X11 via the _GTK_THEME_VARIANT property - support this property, in
order to pick up the correct style variant in the future.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645355
If a window is not maximizable, then that probably means it looks dumb
at very large sizes. Even if its hints would allow you to manually
resize it to a large size, don't allow automatically tiling it to half
the screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647901
An ARGB window with a frame is likely something like a transparent
terminal. It looks awful (and breaks transparency) to draw a big
opaque black shadow under the window, so clip out the region under
the terminal from the shadow we draw.
Add meta_window_get_frame_bounds() to get a cairo region for the
outer bounds of the frame of a window, and modify the frame handling
code to notice changes to the frame shape and discard a cached
region. meta_frames_apply_shapes() is refactored so we can extract
meta_frames_get_frame_bounds() from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635268
If a window can not be tiled, e.g. due to its minimum size hints,
dragging away from the top after activating the maximize tile preview
does not cancel the maximization request, the only way to do so is by
hitting Escape.
To fix, reset the tiling state in the maximize-tile code path as
well if necessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=646149
Apparently the "fox" toolkit doesn't set WM_CLIENT_MACHINE; while we
could do gymnastics to attempt to figure this out (talk to the X
server?), better to just default to FALSE.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647662
Since appears-focus only propagates up from modal dialogs, if an
application removed the modal hint from a dialog before destroying it,
then its parent would be left with a stray reference to it in
attached_focus_window, causing it to be permanently appears-focused.
The obvious fix, calling meta_window_propagate_focus_appearance() when
the modal hint is removed, tends to cause noticeable flashing, because
the window will get drawn unfocused and then focused again.
So instead we just change meta_window_propagate_focus_appearance() to
check the window type only when focusing in, not when focusing out.
This would also cause flashing, but in this case we can avoid it by
not notifying the change in appears-focus on the parent window if it
is the expected_focus_window (which it will be by this point). (This
does mean though that if something weird happens and the window
doesn't end up becoming the focus window, it won't get redrawn
unfocused until something else forces it to.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647613
We need to redraw a window's shadow any time the value of
meta_window_appears_focused() changes. So make that into a property so
we can get notifications on it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636904
This is useful for DnD to another monitor in gnome-shell.
In addition to a normal move it corrects the saved rect for
maximized and fullscreened windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645032
Currently attached modal dialogs are not resizable, but we don't
communicate this to GTK+, so the dialog may end up with resize
grips anyway. As a fix, allow resizing, but account for the dialog
being centered to its parent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643597
Commit 96c43866 changed the tiling behavior to prefer edge tiling
over maximization in corner cases (well, quite literally). As a
side effect, it only allows untiling of edge-tiled windows by
dragging the window towards the correct edge.
This patch restores the old behavior for untiling, while keeping
the new behavior for untiled windows.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=645455
For tiling, we check whether the pointer is near the edges of
the monitor where the pointer is located, so checking that the
pointer is within the bounds of the monitor is unnecessary and
confusing.
If dragging the title bar to the edge of the screen to side-tile,
it's easy to end up above the workarea and end up maximized instead.
Make the entire side of the screen act as edge-tiling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644961
In a performance or regression testing environment, we may want to
only manage windows from a particular test program, and ignore all
other windows. The MUTTER_WM_CLASS_FILTER environment variable is a
list of WM_CLASS values that should be managed; other windows will
be unmapped and ignored.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=644252
This adds a preference that when enabled makes all windows not on
the primary monitor be visible on all workspaces (i.e. not part of the
workspace switching handling).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609258
Sometimes on_all_workspaces is requested by the client/user, and sometimes
its calculated implicitly due to internal state. We split this up so that
we know when the user has explicitly asked for sticky window, when e.g.
setting wmspec properties or storing session info.
on_all_workspaces means this window is visible on all workspaces.
on_all_workspaces_requested, means the user explicitly made the window
sticky somehow (via imported session, _NET_WM_STATE from another wm,
toggled in the window menu, etc). It always implies on_all_workspaces is
TRUE.
Right now the only time we set on_all_workspaces is for override-redirect
windows, but later we can add a "windows on non-primary monitor are not
part of the workspace switching" feature.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=609258
The latter move method will place the window by the origin of the
enclosing window decoration/frame, while the former will place by the
origin of the inner window, itself.
(Also moved meta_window_showing_on_its_workspace comment into
gtk-doc)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642355
If mutter is going to be a "real" library, then it should install its
includes so that users can do
#include <meta/display.h>
rather than
#include <display.h>
So rename the includedir accordingly, move src/include to src/meta,
and fix up all internal references.
There were a handful of header files in src/include that were not
installed; this appears to have been part of a plan to keep core/,
ui/, and compositor/ from looking at each others' private includes,
but that wasn't really working anyway. So move all non-installed
headers back into core/ or ui/.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=643959
If we are previewing hidden windows, we might be previewing them in a context
like a thumbnail view of a workspace where we care about positioning. So, instead
of waiting until the window is first actually shown to place it, if
live_hidden_previews is set, place the window window when we first compute its
visibility, even if we don't end up showing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641309
The previous tiling state of a grabbed window should be restored
if the drag operation is cancelled (by hitting the Escape key).
This might involve to meta_window_tile(), so export the function
in window-private.h.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=639988
To deal with reentrancy from compositor plugins doing things like
moving windows between workspaces in an effect callback, update
the visible_to_compositor flag before calling into the compositor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613124
Maximized tiled windows end up with an inconsistent tile mode when
unmaximized by other means than dragging the window free (e.g.
using the unmaximize button or double clicking the title bar), so
reset the tile mode when unmaximizing.
This is not a problem for side-by-side tiling, as there are no
alternatives to dragging the window free.
When a tiled window is maximized (e.g. by clicking the title bar
button), unmaximizing the window restores the tiled state. While
this is reasonable for side-by-side tiling, it is confusing for
"maximize" tiled windows, as unmaximization has no visible effect.
Change unmaximize to only restore the tiled state of side-by-side
tiled windows.
The original patch triggered "maximize" when the window was dragged
to the top, so that the pointer was below or on the monitor edge and
above the work area's top.
If there's no chrome at the top of the monitor, so that monitor edge
and work area top fall together, the pointer cannot be moved above
the work area's top, so tiling was not triggered.
The old behavior of being able to shake loose a maximized window
overlaps with and is for the most part superceded by top edge tiling.
This commit changes the code to only enable shake loose behavior
when edge tiling is disabled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630548
In addition to the existing side-by-side tiling modes, this commit
adds a new "maximize" tiling mode. It allows the user to maximize
their windows (in other words, tile with the edge panels) by dragging
their window to the top edge of the monitor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630548
The meta_window_handle_mouse_grab_op_event function ensures
the tile_mode variable is in a consistent state after a drag
op is finished.
The way this is current done is:
if (!window->maximized_vertically &&
window->tile_mode != META_TILE_NONE)
window->tile_mode = META_TILE_NONE;
While valid, it doesn't "read" as well as using the
META_WINDOW_TILED_SIDE_BY_SIDE macro, since the macro is specifically
about side-by-side tiling.
This commit just changes things to use the macro and to not bother
checking the tile mode (since if we just reset it anyway, then it doesn't
matter if the value is right or wrong to begin with).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630548
Currently, the new tiling feature, supports side-by-side, horizontal
tiling when dragging windows to one of the vertical edges of a monitor.
Other types of tiling (on other monitor edges) are potentially useful,
though.
This commit renames the preference from side_by_side_tiling to
edge_tiling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=630548
These functions duplicate existing properties; they are added for
convenience and to avoid the GObject property code on some
performance critical painting paths.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=592382
