This is the bulk of the clutter-1.22 → master merge.
The clutter-1.22 branch is where the current development of Clutter
happens, and contains all the history of the project after the API
bump branch point.
Revert all the work that happened on the master branch.
Sadly, this is the only way to merge the current development branch back
into master.
It is now abundantly clear that I merged the 1.99 branch far too soon,
and that Clutter 2.0 won't happen any time soon, if at all.
Since having the development happen on a separate branch throws a lot of
people into confusion, let's undo the clutter-1.99 → master merge, and
move back the development of Clutter to the master branch.
In order to do so, we need to do some surgery to the Git repository.
First, we do a massive revert in a single commit of all that happened
since the switch to 1.99 and the API version bump done with the
89a2862b057423c3c1fc666e6fa776ccacf377dd commit. The history is too long
to be reverted commit by commit without being extremely messy.
We rely on having the DISPLAY environment variable set, otherwise we
default to skipping all tests automatically. The TestEnvironment key
inside the installed test launcher keyfile replaces the whole
environment, instead of just adding to it like the TESTS_ENVIRONMENT
automake variable.
Need to hide the login1 DBus wrappers from the docs, because
they use symbols that don't start with meta_ so they're not
exported from the library. And they're not public API anyway.
Break down the beautiful core/ui abstraction barrier by inserting
a pointer to MetaWindow into a MetaUIFrame. I'm a scoundrel, I know.
We'll use this very soon to destroy meta_core_get.
The easing state is part of the AnimationInfo structure, which is stored
inside the GObject's datalist. Each instance frees the data stored there
during finalization, so there is no point for us to restore an easing
state (which may or may not be the last one) just to have everything
cleared out once we chain up to GObject's own finalize() implementation.
Whenever we added a frame to the GHashTable, we added the frame itself
as the value, and a pointer to its storage of the frame window XID,
as the key.
When we iterated over the hash table, we actually looked up the
MetaUIFrame in the key, which might seem extraordinarily wrong, but
eagle-eyed viewers might notice that the XID is the first field in
MetaUIFrame, so the key and value are actually the same pointer.
Changing the layout of MetaUIFrame at all causes this to go haywire,
so let's not do this and simply put the MetaUIFrame in the value,
as expected.
When the frame type updates, we were doing something funky that
caused us to reset the title used for the text layout here. I can't
really think of any place that it would trigger, and in testing I
haven't hit this either, so let's just remove the fancy logic and
assert this.
