Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Neil Roberts
6a62e3077b sdl: Don't set SDL_GL_DOUBLEBUFFER when the swap chain has no pref
The ‘length’ for the swap chain is initially -1 which is supposed to
mean ‘no preference’. However, both of the SDL winsys's were
explicitly setting the SDL_GL_DOUBLEBUFFER attribute to zero in that
case which would try to disable double buffering.

On OS X, the equivalent to eglSwapBuffers (ie, [NSOpenGLContext
flushBuffer]) does nothing for a single buffer context. The
cogl-sdl-hello example does not specify the swap chain length so
presumably it would end up with a single buffer config. When
cogl_onscreen_swap_buffers is called it therefore does nothing and
nothing is painted.

I guess to make single-buffered contexts actually useful we should
expose some public equivalent to glFlush so that you can ensure the
rendering commands will actually hit the buffer. Alternatively we
could document that cogl_onscreen_swap_buffers performs this task on
single-buffered configs and then we could make the SDL winsys
explicitly call glFlush in that case.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 71e57f99002d5dee79bbd44b3bc57712b99acb55)
2012-11-23 15:45:26 +00:00
Neil Roberts
df77e8565e Don't use eglGetProcAddress to retrieve core functions
According to the EGL spec, eglGetProcAddress should only be used to
retrieve extension functions. It also says that returning non-NULL
does not mean the extension is available so you could interpret this
as saying that the function is allowed to return garbage for core
functions. This seems to happen at least for the Android
implementation of EGL.

To workaround this the winsys's are now passed down a flag to say
whether the function is from the core API. This information is already
in the gl-prototypes headers as the minimum core GL version and as a
pair of flags to specify whether it is available in core GLES1 and
GLES2. If the function is in core the EGL winsys will now avoid using
eglGetProcAddress and always fallback to querying the library directly
with the GModule API.

The GLX winsys is left alone because glXGetProcAddress apparently
supports querying core API and extension functions.

The WGL winsys could ideally be changed because wglGetProcAddress
should also only be used for extension functions but the situation is
slightly different because WGL considers anything from GL > 1.1 to be
an extension so it would need a bit more information to determine
whether to query the function directly from the library.

The SDL winsys is also left alone because it's not as easy to portably
determine which GL library SDL has chosen to load in order to resolve
the symbols directly.

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 72089730ad06ccdd38a344279a893965ae68cec1)

  Since we aren't able to break API on the 1.12 branch
  cogl_get_proc_address is still supported but isn't easily able to
  determine whether the given name corresponds to a core symbol or
  not.  For now we just assume the symbol being queried isn't part
  of the core GL api and update the documentation accordingly.
2012-08-06 14:27:45 +01:00
Neil Roberts
17c818a9a7 Add an SDL2 winsys
This adds an alternate version of the SDL winsys using the SDL 2 API.
The two versions are mutually exclusive and share the same
CoglWinsysID. Version 2 of SDL fits a little bit better with Cogl
because it supports multiple windows and the video subsystem can be
initialised entirely independently of the rest of the subsystems.

The SDL2 winsys creates an invisible dummy window in order to bind the
GL context after creating the Cogl display. This is similar to how the
X11 winsys's work.

SDL2 seems to support compiling with support for both GL and GLES.
However there doesn't seem to be a way to select between the two
backends outside of SDL. In fact if you do compile them both in it
seems to break down because it will always try to use the window
system functions from the GLES backend because those are filled in
second in the vtable. However when creating the window it will always
prefer to use the GL function to choose a visual. This function gets
confused because the GL backend has not been initialised at that
point. The Cogl backend therefore just leaves it up to SDL to pick a
sensible backend. It will then verify that it picked a GL library
which matches the Cogl driver by checking the string from
glGetString(GL_VERSION).

Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>

(cherry picked from commit 6cb5ab41355e7bfe28f367cf4afa39a7afcfeec2)
2012-08-06 14:27:44 +01:00