Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Robert Bragg
a0441778ad This re-licenses Cogl 1.18 under the MIT license
Since the Cogl 1.18 branch is actively maintained in parallel with the
master branch; this is a counter part to commit 1b83ef938fc16b which
re-licensed the master branch to use the MIT license.

This re-licensing is a follow up to the proposal that was sent to the
Cogl mailing list:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cogl/2013-December/001465.html

Note: there was a copyright assignment policy in place for Clutter (and
therefore Cogl which was part of Clutter at the time) until the 11th of
June 2010 and so we only checked the details after that point (commit
0bbf50f905)

For each file, authors were identified via this Git command:
$ git blame -p -C -C -C20 -M -M10  0bbf50f905..HEAD

We received blanket approvals for re-licensing all Red Hat and Collabora
contributions which reduced how many people needed to be contacted
individually:
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cogl/2013-December/001470.html
- http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cogl/2014-January/001536.html

Individual approval requests were sent to all the other identified authors
who all confirmed the re-license on the Cogl mailinglist:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cogl/2014-January

As well as updating the copyright header in all sources files, the
COPYING file has been updated to reflect the license change and also
document the other licenses used in Cogl such as the SGI Free Software
License B, version 2.0 and the 3-clause BSD license.

This patch was not simply cherry-picked from master; but the same
methodology was used to check the source files.
2014-02-22 02:02:53 +00:00
Robert Bragg
f1c2d7e965 2.0: Add cogl2-experimental.h + don't pollute .pc CFLAGS
Instead of adding -DCOGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_2_0_API to the
cogl-2.0-experimental.pc file we now install a cogl2-experimental.h
that #defines COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_2_0_API before including
cogl.h.

The problem with having the define in the .pc file is that you might
develop a library that depends on the experimental 2.0 api internally
and then you might want to use that library with Clutter which still
uses the 1.0 API but the .pc file for your library will indirectly,
automatically enable the 2.0 api which can cause conflicts.
2011-09-09 15:06:31 +01:00