brl/mutter
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
75226501cf
mutter/cogl/cogl-pipeline.h

174 lines
5.1 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

[cogl] Updates all file headers and removes lots of trailing white space Adds missing notices, and ensures all the notices are consistent. The Cogl blurb also now reads: * Cogl * * An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
2009-04-27 10:48:12 -04:00
/*
* Cogl
*
* An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
*
* Copyright (C) 2007,2008,2009 Intel Corporation.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
Remove mentions of the FSF address Since using addresses that might change is something that finally the FSF acknowledge as a plausible scenario (after changing address twice), the license blurb in the source files should use the URI for getting the license in case the library did not come with it. Not that URIs cannot possibly change, but at least it's easier to set up a redirection at the same place. As a side note: this commit closes the oldes bug in Clutter's bug report tool. http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=521
2010-03-01 07:56:10 -05:00
* License along with this library. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*
[cogl] Updates all file headers and removes lots of trailing white space Adds missing notices, and ensures all the notices are consistent. The Cogl blurb also now reads: * Cogl * * An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
2009-04-27 10:48:12 -04:00
*/
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
#if !defined(__COGL_H_INSIDE__) && !defined(CLUTTER_COMPILATION)
#error "Only <cogl/cogl.h> can be included directly."
#endif
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
#ifndef __COGL_PIPELINE_H__
#define __COGL_PIPELINE_H__
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
Adds a context arg to cogl_pipeline_new() As we move towards Cogl 2.0 we are aiming to remove the need for a default global CoglContext and so everything should be explicitly related to a context somehow. CoglPipelines are top level objects and so this patch adds a context argument to cogl_pipeline_new(). Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2012-02-18 11:03:10 -05:00
/* We forward declare the CoglPipeline type here to avoid some circular
* dependency issues with the following headers.
*/
typedef struct _CoglPipeline CoglPipeline;
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
#include <cogl/cogl-types.h>
Adds a context arg to cogl_pipeline_new() As we move towards Cogl 2.0 we are aiming to remove the need for a default global CoglContext and so everything should be explicitly related to a context somehow. CoglPipelines are top level objects and so this patch adds a context argument to cogl_pipeline_new(). Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2012-02-18 11:03:10 -05:00
#include <cogl/cogl-context.h>
cogl-pipeline: Add two hook points for adding shader snippets This adds two new public experimental functions for attaching CoglSnippets to two hook points on a CoglPipeline: void cogl_pipeline_add_vertex_hook (CoglPipeline *, CoglSnippet *) void cogl_pipeline_add_fragment_hook (CoglPipeline *, CoglSnippet *) The hooks are intended to be around the entire vertex or fragment processing. That means the pre string in the snippet will be inserted at the very top of the main function and the post function will be inserted at the very end. The declarations get inserted in the global scope. The snippets are stored in two separate linked lists with a structure containing an enum representing the hook point and a pointer to the snippet. The lists are meant to be for hooks that affect the vertex shader and fragment shader respectively. Although there are currently only two hooks and the names match these two lists, the intention is *not* that each new hook will be in a separate list. The separation of the lists is just to make it easier to determine which shader needs to be regenerated when a new snippet is added. When a pipeline becomes the authority for either the vertex or fragment snipper state, it simply copies the entire list from the previous authority (although of course the shader snippet objects are referenced instead of copied so it doesn't duplicate the source strings). Each string is inserted into its own block in the shader. This means that each string has its own scope so it doesn't need to worry about name collisions with variables in other snippets. However it does mean that the pre and post strings can't share variables. It could be possible to wrap both parts in one block and then wrap the actual inner hook code in another block, however this would mean that any further snippets within the outer snippet would be able to see those variables. Perhaps something to consider would be to put each snippet into its own function which calls another function between the pre and post strings to do further processing. The pipeline cache for generated programs was previously shared with the fragment shader cache because the state that affects vertex shaders was a subset of the state that affects fragment shaders. This is no longer the case because there is a separate state mask for vertex snippets so the program cache now has its own hash table. Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
2011-11-17 11:52:21 -05:00
#include <cogl/cogl-snippet.h>
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
pipeline: Split more code out from cogl-pipeline.c This splits out the core CoglPipelineLayer support code from cogl-pipeline.c into cogl-pipeline-layer.c; it splits out the debugging code for dumping a pipeline to a .dot file into cogl-pipeline-debug.c and it splits the CoglPipelineNode support which is shared between CoglPipeline and CoglPipelineLayer into cogl-node.c. Note: cogl-pipeline-layer.c only contains the layer code directly relating to CoglPipelineLayer objects; it does not contain any _cogl_pipeline API relating to how CoglPipeline tracks and manipulates layers.
2011-09-08 19:40:06 -04:00
G_BEGIN_DECLS
pipeline: mark all cogl-pipeline.h symbols experimental All of the cogl_pipeline API is currently experimental so this makes sure the API is surrounded by #ifdef COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API guards and all the symbols have a #define to give them an _EXP suffix as we do for other experimental API. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2011-09-07 20:21:24 -04:00
#ifdef COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
/**
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* SECTION:cogl-pipeline
* @short_description: Functions for creating and manipulating the GPU
* pipeline
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Cogl allows creating and manipulating objects representing the full
* configuration of the GPU pipeline. In simplified terms the GPU
* pipeline takes primitive geometry as the input, it first performs
* vertex processing, allowing you to deform your geometry, then
* rasterizes that (turning it from pure geometry into fragments) then
* performs fragment processing including depth testing and texture
* mapping. Finally it blends the result with the framebuffer.
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
*/
material: Replace CoglHandle with CoglMaterial * As part of the ongoing effort to remove CoglHandle from the API this switches the cogl_material API to use a strongly typed CoglMaterial pointer instead of CoglHandle.
2010-06-22 09:02:17 -04:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
#define COGL_PIPELINE(OBJECT) ((CoglPipeline *)OBJECT)
material: Replace CoglHandle with CoglMaterial * As part of the ongoing effort to remove CoglHandle from the API this switches the cogl_material API to use a strongly typed CoglMaterial pointer instead of CoglHandle.
2010-06-22 09:02:17 -04:00
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
/**
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* cogl_pipeline_new:
Adds a context arg to cogl_pipeline_new() As we move towards Cogl 2.0 we are aiming to remove the need for a default global CoglContext and so everything should be explicitly related to a context somehow. CoglPipelines are top level objects and so this patch adds a context argument to cogl_pipeline_new(). Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2012-02-18 11:03:10 -05:00
* @context: a #CoglContext
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Allocates and initializes a default simple pipeline that will color
* a primitive white.
[doc] Hooks up cogl-material reference documentation Adds some more gtk-doc comments to cogl-material.h, and adds a new section to cogl-sections.txt
2008-12-22 11:19:49 -05:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Return value: a pointer to a new #CoglPipeline
pipeline: mark all cogl-pipeline.h symbols experimental All of the cogl_pipeline API is currently experimental so this makes sure the API is surrounded by #ifdef COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API guards and all the symbols have a #define to give them an _EXP suffix as we do for other experimental API. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2011-09-07 20:21:24 -04:00
*
* Since: 2.0
* Stability: Unstable
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *
Adds a context arg to cogl_pipeline_new() As we move towards Cogl 2.0 we are aiming to remove the need for a default global CoglContext and so everything should be explicitly related to a context somehow. CoglPipelines are top level objects and so this patch adds a context argument to cogl_pipeline_new(). Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2012-02-18 11:03:10 -05:00
cogl_pipeline_new (CoglContext *context);
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
[cogl-material] Adds cogl_material_copy() API cogl_material_copy can be used to create a new CoglHandle referencing a copy of some given material. From now on we will advise that developers always aim to use this function instead of cogl_material_new() when creating a material that is in any way derived from another. By using cogl_material_copy, Cogl can maintain an ancestry for each material and keep track of "similar" materials. The plan is that Cogl will use this information to minimize the cost of GPU state transitions.
2009-11-11 07:50:48 -05:00
/**
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* cogl_pipeline_copy:
* @source: a #CoglPipeline object to copy
[cogl-material] Adds cogl_material_copy() API cogl_material_copy can be used to create a new CoglHandle referencing a copy of some given material. From now on we will advise that developers always aim to use this function instead of cogl_material_new() when creating a material that is in any way derived from another. By using cogl_material_copy, Cogl can maintain an ancestry for each material and keep track of "similar" materials. The plan is that Cogl will use this information to minimize the cost of GPU state transitions.
2009-11-11 07:50:48 -05:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Creates a new pipeline with the configuration copied from the
* source pipeline.
[cogl-material] Adds cogl_material_copy() API cogl_material_copy can be used to create a new CoglHandle referencing a copy of some given material. From now on we will advise that developers always aim to use this function instead of cogl_material_new() when creating a material that is in any way derived from another. By using cogl_material_copy, Cogl can maintain an ancestry for each material and keep track of "similar" materials. The plan is that Cogl will use this information to minimize the cost of GPU state transitions.
2009-11-11 07:50:48 -05:00
*
* We would strongly advise developers to always aim to use
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* cogl_pipeline_copy() instead of cogl_pipeline_new() whenever there will
* be any similarity between two pipelines. Copying a pipeline helps Cogl
* keep track of a pipelines ancestry which we may use to help minimize GPU
[cogl-material] Adds cogl_material_copy() API cogl_material_copy can be used to create a new CoglHandle referencing a copy of some given material. From now on we will advise that developers always aim to use this function instead of cogl_material_new() when creating a material that is in any way derived from another. By using cogl_material_copy, Cogl can maintain an ancestry for each material and keep track of "similar" materials. The plan is that Cogl will use this information to minimize the cost of GPU state transitions.
2009-11-11 07:50:48 -05:00
* state changes.
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Returns: a pointer to the newly allocated #CoglPipeline
[cogl-material] Adds cogl_material_copy() API cogl_material_copy can be used to create a new CoglHandle referencing a copy of some given material. From now on we will advise that developers always aim to use this function instead of cogl_material_new() when creating a material that is in any way derived from another. By using cogl_material_copy, Cogl can maintain an ancestry for each material and keep track of "similar" materials. The plan is that Cogl will use this information to minimize the cost of GPU state transitions.
2009-11-11 07:50:48 -05:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Since: 2.0
pipeline: mark all cogl-pipeline.h symbols experimental All of the cogl_pipeline API is currently experimental so this makes sure the API is surrounded by #ifdef COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API guards and all the symbols have a #define to give them an _EXP suffix as we do for other experimental API. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2011-09-07 20:21:24 -04:00
* Stability: Unstable
[cogl-material] Adds cogl_material_copy() API cogl_material_copy can be used to create a new CoglHandle referencing a copy of some given material. From now on we will advise that developers always aim to use this function instead of cogl_material_new() when creating a material that is in any way derived from another. By using cogl_material_copy, Cogl can maintain an ancestry for each material and keep track of "similar" materials. The plan is that Cogl will use this information to minimize the cost of GPU state transitions.
2009-11-11 07:50:48 -05:00
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
CoglPipeline *
cogl_pipeline_copy (CoglPipeline *source);
Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing My previous work to provide muti-texturing support has been extended into a CoglMaterial abstraction that adds control over the texture combine functions (controlling how multiple texture layers are blended together), the gl blend function (used for blending the final primitive with the framebuffer), the alpha function (used to discard fragments based on their alpha channel), describing attributes such as a diffuse, ambient and specular color (for use with the standard OpenGL lighting model), and per layer rotations. (utilizing the new CoglMatrix utility API) For now the only way this abstraction is exposed is via a new cogl_material_rectangle function, that is similar to cogl_texture_rectangle but doesn't take a texture handle (the source material is pulled from the context), and the array of texture coordinates is extended to be able to supply coordinates for each layer. Note: this function doesn't support sliced textures; supporting sliced textures is a non trivial problem, considering the ability to rotate layers. Note: cogl_material_rectangle, has quite a few workarounds, for a number of other limitations within Cogl a.t.m. Note: The GLES1/2 multi-texturing support has yet to be updated to use the material abstraction.
2008-12-11 15:11:30 -05:00
/**
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* cogl_is_pipeline:
[cogl] Add cogl_is_material to cogl-material.h The COGL_DEFINE_HANDLE macro generates a cogl_is_<type> function as well, to check whether a CoglHandle opaque pointer is of type <type>. The handle for CoglMaterial does not export cogl_is_material() in its installed header.
2009-02-19 06:55:54 -05:00
* @handle: A CoglHandle
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Gets whether the given handle references an existing pipeline object.
[cogl] Add cogl_is_material to cogl-material.h The COGL_DEFINE_HANDLE macro generates a cogl_is_<type> function as well, to check whether a CoglHandle opaque pointer is of type <type>. The handle for CoglMaterial does not export cogl_is_material() in its installed header.
2009-02-19 06:55:54 -05:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Return value: %TRUE if the handle references a #CoglPipeline,
[cogl] Add cogl_is_material to cogl-material.h The COGL_DEFINE_HANDLE macro generates a cogl_is_<type> function as well, to check whether a CoglHandle opaque pointer is of type <type>. The handle for CoglMaterial does not export cogl_is_material() in its installed header.
2009-02-19 06:55:54 -05:00
* %FALSE otherwise
pipeline: mark all cogl-pipeline.h symbols experimental All of the cogl_pipeline API is currently experimental so this makes sure the API is surrounded by #ifdef COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API guards and all the symbols have a #define to give them an _EXP suffix as we do for other experimental API. Reviewed-by: Neil Roberts <neil@linux.intel.com>
2011-09-07 20:21:24 -04:00
*
* Since: 2.0
* Stability: Unstable
[cogl] Add cogl_is_material to cogl-material.h The COGL_DEFINE_HANDLE macro generates a cogl_is_<type> function as well, to check whether a CoglHandle opaque pointer is of type <type>. The handle for CoglMaterial does not export cogl_is_material() in its installed header.
2009-02-19 06:55:54 -05:00
*/
cogl: improves header and coding style consistency We've had complaints that our Cogl code/headers are a bit "special" so this is a first pass at tidying things up by giving them some consistency. These changes are all consistent with how new code in Cogl is being written, but the style isn't consistently applied across all code yet. There are two parts to this patch; but since each one required a large amount of effort to maintain tidy indenting it made sense to combine the changes to reduce the time spent re indenting the same lines. The first change is to use a consistent style for declaring function prototypes in headers. Cogl headers now consistently use this style for prototypes: return_type cogl_function_name (CoglType arg0, CoglType arg1); Not everyone likes this style, but it seems that most of the currently active Cogl developers agree on it. The second change is to constrain the use of redundant glib data types in Cogl. Uses of gint, guint, gfloat, glong, gulong and gchar have all been replaced with int, unsigned int, float, long, unsigned long and char respectively. When talking about pixel data; use of guchar has been replaced with guint8, otherwise unsigned char can be used. The glib types that we continue to use for portability are gboolean, gint{8,16,32,64}, guint{8,16,32,64} and gsize. The general intention is that Cogl should look palatable to the widest range of C programmers including those outside the Gnome community so - especially for the public API - we want to minimize the number of foreign looking typedefs.
2010-02-09 20:57:32 -05:00
gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
cogl_is_pipeline (CoglHandle handle);
Fully integrates CoglMaterial throughout the rest of Cogl This glues CoglMaterial in as the fundamental way that Cogl describes how to fill in geometry. It adds cogl_set_source (), which is used to set the material which will be used by all subsequent drawing functions It adds cogl_set_source_texture as a convenience for setting up a default material with a single texture layer, and cogl_set_source_color is now also a convenience for setting up a material with a solid fill. "drawing functions" include, cogl_rectangle, cogl_texture_rectangle, cogl_texture_multiple_rectangles, cogl_texture_polygon (though the cogl_texture_* funcs have been renamed; see below for details), cogl_path_fill/stroke and cogl_vertex_buffer_draw*. cogl_texture_rectangle, cogl_texture_multiple_rectangles and cogl_texture_polygon no longer take a texture handle; instead the current source material is referenced. The functions have also been renamed to: cogl_rectangle_with_texture_coords, cogl_rectangles_with_texture_coords and cogl_polygon respectivly. Most code that previously did: cogl_texture_rectangle (tex_handle, x, y,...); needs to be changed to now do: cogl_set_source_texture (tex_handle); cogl_rectangle_with_texture_coords (x, y,....); In the less likely case where you were blending your source texture with a color like: cogl_set_source_color4ub (r,g,b,a); /* where r,g,b,a isn't just white */ cogl_texture_rectangle (tex_handle, x, y,...); you will need your own material to do that: mat = cogl_material_new (); cogl_material_set_color4ub (r,g,b,a); cogl_material_set_layer (mat, 0, tex_handle)); cogl_set_source_material (mat); Code that uses the texture coordinates, 0, 0, 1, 1 don't need to use cog_rectangle_with_texure_coords since these are the coordinates that cogl_rectangle will use. For cogl_texture_polygon; as well as dropping the texture handle, the n_vertices and vertices arguments were transposed for consistency. So code previously written as: cogl_texture_polygon (tex_handle, 3, verts, TRUE); need to be written as: cogl_set_source_texture (tex_handle); cogl_polygon (verts, 3, TRUE); All of the unit tests have been updated to now use the material API and test-cogl-material has been renamed to test-cogl-multitexture since any textured quad is now technically a test of CoglMaterial but this test specifically creates a material with multiple texture layers. Note: The GLES backend has not been updated yet; that will be done in a following commit.
2009-01-23 11:15:40 -05:00
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
/**
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* CoglPipelineLayerCallback:
* @pipeline: The #CoglPipeline whos layers are being iterated
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
* @layer_index: The current layer index
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* @user_data: The private data passed to cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer()
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* The callback prototype used with cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer() for
* iterating all the layers of a @pipeline.
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Since: 2.0
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
* Stability: Unstable
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
typedef gboolean (*CoglPipelineLayerCallback) (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
int layer_index,
void *user_data);
/**
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer:
* @pipeline: A #CoglPipeline object
* @callback: A #CoglPipelineLayerCallback to be called for each layer
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
* index
* @user_data: Private data that will be passed to the callback
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Iterates all the layer indices of the given @pipeline.
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
* Since: 2.0
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
* Stability: Unstable
*/
void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
CoglPipelineLayerCallback callback,
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 16:33:26 -04:00
void *user_data);
cogl-pipeline: Add support for setting uniform values This adds the following new public experimental functions to set uniform values on a CoglPipeline: void cogl_pipeline_set_uniform_1f (CoglPipeline *pipeline, int uniform_location, float value); void cogl_pipeline_set_uniform_1i (CoglPipeline *pipeline, int uniform_location, int value); void cogl_pipeline_set_uniform_float (CoglPipeline *pipeline, int uniform_location, int n_components, int count, const float *value); void cogl_pipeline_set_uniform_int (CoglPipeline *pipeline, int uniform_location, int n_components, int count, const int *value); void cogl_pipeline_set_uniform_matrix (CoglPipeline *pipeline, int uniform_location, int dimensions, int count, gboolean transpose, const float *value); These are similar to the old functions used to set uniforms on a CoglProgram. To get a value to pass in as the uniform_location there is also: int cogl_pipeline_get_uniform_location (CoglPipeline *pipeline, const char *uniform_name); Conceptually the uniform locations are tied to the pipeline so that whenever setting a value for a new pipeline the application is expected to call this function. However in practice the uniform locations are global to the CoglContext. The names are stored in a linked list where the position in the list is the uniform location. The global indices are used so that each pipeline can store a mask of which uniforms it overrides. That way it is quicker to detect which uniforms are different from the last pipeline that used the same CoglProgramState so it can avoid flushing uniforms that haven't changed. Currently the values are not actually compared which means that it will only avoid flushing a uniform if there is a common ancestor that sets the value (or if the same pipeline is being flushed again - in which case the pipeline and its common ancestor are the same thing). The uniform values are stored in the big state of the pipeline as a sparse linked list. A bitmask stores which values have been overridden and only overridden values are stored in the linked list. Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
2011-11-03 13:20:43 -04:00
/**
* cogl_pipeline_get_uniform_location:
* @pipeline: A #CoglPipeline object
* @uniform_name: The name of a uniform
*
* This is used to get an integer representing the uniform with the
* name @uniform_name. The integer can be passed to functions such as
* cogl_pipeline_set_uniform_1f() to set the value of a uniform.
*
* This function will always return a valid integer. Ie, unlike
* OpenGL, it does not return -1 if the uniform is not available in
* this pipeline so it can not be used to test whether uniforms are
* present. It is not necessary to set the program on the pipeline
* before calling this function.
*
* Return value: A integer representing the location of the given uniform.
*
* Since: 2.0
* Stability: Unstable
*/
int
cogl_pipeline_get_uniform_location (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
const char *uniform_name);
material: Make CoglMaterial responsible for depth state This redirects the legacy depth testing APIs through CoglMaterial and adds a new experimental cogl_material_ API for handling the depth testing state. This adds the following new functions: cogl_material_set_depth_test_enabled cogl_material_get_depth_test_enabled cogl_material_set_depth_writing_enabled cogl_material_get_depth_writing_enabled cogl_material_set_depth_test_function cogl_material_get_depth_test_function cogl_material_set_depth_range cogl_material_get_depth_range As with other experimental Cogl API you need to define COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API to access them and their stability isn't yet guaranteed.
2010-05-26 06:33:32 -04:00
#endif /* COGL_ENABLE_EXPERIMENTAL_API */
[doc] Hooks up cogl-material reference documentation Adds some more gtk-doc comments to cogl-material.h, and adds a new section to cogl-sections.txt
2008-12-22 11:19:49 -05:00
G_END_DECLS
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 13:54:57 -04:00
#endif /* __COGL_PIPELINE_H__ */
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink