Creating a content object from a cairo surface may fail, in which case
we return an empty content with a 0x0 preferred size.
However when we treat such a content object as GIcon, we happily load
it anyway. Don't do that, so consumers like StIcon can fall back properly
to an alternative.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1761>
While most GIcons passed to this function cause a StImageContent to be
created with the requested size, cairo surface based icons already are
passed as StImageContent with a preferred size corresponding to the
size of the surface they were created from. As a result icons of window
backed applications were never scaled up like the other icons. Fix this
by ignoring the content size for these case.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1751>
This is how the code works and how it is already used from the C side.
There would also be no point in keeping this transfer none, because
textures generated from this function will not be shared and are not
kept in the cache.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1718>
This reverts commit 87558efbf1.
The commit did not fix the bug it was supposed to fix, it just
complicated the code. The hopefully correct fix is in the previous
commit.
The point of this commit was to ensure everything gets removed when
bind->source gets removed. This however was already the case since the
signal handler was already connected to bind->source and has a
destructor registered that takes care of everything. And since gobject
destroys its signal handlers before it clears the weak refs, this new
weak ref was effectively never being used.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1718>
If the icon surface of a window got updated and its type or format no
longer match what we expect, st_texture_cache_reset_texture() might
overwrite the existing image in the bind with a new image, while still
keeping the weak ref on the old image. Due to this the old image might
trigger a st_texture_cache_on_pixbuf_notify() after the bind has already
been freed by g_signal_handlers_destroy() in the bind source. While this
usually would remove the weak ref, the weak ref it tries to remove is
on the new image, not the old one. The call to
st_texture_cache_on_pixbuf_notify() then tries to read the already
free'd memory from the bind which causes the cast to G_OBJECT to fail,
resulting in the crash.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3785
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1718>
This will be needed for fine tuning of the visible area for appGrid
navigation purposes. We most nominally can let it happen via CSS as
the size calculations happen on size allocate, so we want to avoid
triggering relayouts while adapting to the given size.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1630>
Instead of taking just vertical/horizontal offsets, take a ClutterMargin
to allow us set the fade offsets on each direction specifically. Also,
handle negative values in margins, the fade effect will run in the negative
space left by the scrollview padding instead. Another difference now is
that areas outside the extents of the effect will be transparent, instead
of the effect ending abruptly past the given extents.
This will be used by the app grid, in order to selectively let see either
of next/prev pages while navigating.
While at it, fix code style issues in st_scroll_view_update_fade_effect(),
and clean up unused variables from the GLSL code.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1630>
This property controls whether the viewport clips the content to its own
allocation or not. This will be necessary in special modes that we want to
render past the viewport inside a scrollview.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1630>
Commit 473e77e2c5 fixed applying the :insensitive pseudo class to
initially unreactive widgets, and adjusted the style test to work
with that.
In hindsight, we can do better than just making the test work, and
include a test case for the :insensitive styling as well (namely
the issue the previous commit was fixing).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1649>
We are applying the :insensitive pseudo class to unreactive widgets,
or at least we are supposed to. As we currently only update the style
on notify, we don't apply it to initially unreactive widgets.
This was covered up partially until recently when Clutter started to
use G_PARAM_EXPLICIT_NOTIFY. Before that, the notify handler would run
when explicitly setting :reactive to FALSE at construction time.
Make sure we always apply the pseudo class correctly by updating it
after construct properties have been set.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3685
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1648>
We want to use the fast path of filling the entire area if either the
left and right shadows would overlap or the top and bottom shadows. The
latter check was wrong due to a typo resulting in the regular path
being used in some cases it couldn't (and shouldn't) handle.
This was causing the inset shadow used to highlight panel buttons to
not appear for buttons above a certain width.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1646>
The shader code currently only accounts for padding for the
bottom and right fades, but not for top and left.
As a result, we only fade the right edge when swiping through app
picker pages, whoops.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1569>
What the blur shader does is going n_steps in each direction (e.g. in case
we're in the horizontal pass that means left and right direction), sampling
the adjacent texels of the texel we're currently blurring. That means
n_steps actually is the amount of texels we're sampling in one direction,
not in both directions.
Make n_steps match what the blur shader does, and rename it to sampling_radius
to match what it really means. Do that for both st-theme-node-drawing.c and
st-private.c
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1542>
In some styles the top or left sections of box-shadows would go missing
even though they had non-zero thickness. This was because the inner
local coordinates could become very slightly negative and were then
incorrectly judged to be invisible.
Negative coordinates should not be ignored because that's where the
entire top/left sections of shadow are meant to exist. It's only the
sections of shadow with zero thickness that we should skip.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1417>
Not checking for this would result in `clutter_actor_add_child`
failing, but StBin keeping a copy in `priv->child`. So later on,
`st_bin_remove` would never be called on it and this assertion
would fail and crash the whole shell:
```
static void
st_bin_destroy (ClutterActor *actor)
{
StBinPrivate *priv = st_bin_get_instance_private (ST_BIN (actor));
if (priv->child)
clutter_actor_destroy (priv->child);
g_assert (priv->child == NULL);
```
By disallowing spurious `st_bin_set_child` calls we now prevent StBin
from entering such a corrupt state and the above assertion won't fail
anymore.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1507>
Just like the internal ClutterText, the icon actors are part of the
entry. It therefore makes sense for the icons to not react to clicks
when the entry itself is non-reactive; again, just like the text.
That behavior is also consistent with icons in GTK entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3138
Like `GtkAdjustment`, `StAdjustment:changed` is not emitted for the
`value` property except when changed with `st_adjustment_set_values()`.
Note this behaviour in the signal documentation
closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/3147
(optional) is only valid for (out) or (inout) parameters (that are
marked as such).
However GError** arguments appear as throws="1" in the GIR anyway
instead of an explicit parameter, so we don't need any annotation
at all here.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1408
Much of St is undocumented, aside from input/output arguments. This is
no doubt because a lot of it parallels Gtk closely, but is worth
improving since many new programmers are not familiar with Gtk.
closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2983
The framebuffer we use for rendering shadows is scaled by the resource
scale, that means we also need to offset coordinates when translating
them to the framebuffers coordinate system.
So far we forgot to do that when translating the framebuffer using the
position of the actor, which lead to small rendering bugs of
text-shadows for actors allocated at non-zero origins. To fix that,
simply multiply those positions with the actors resource scale.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1390
We still load the surface into an StImageContent, but instead of
adding the content to an actor we hand out, return the content
itself (as GIcon).
That means we lose the ability to specify an icon size, but as we
get the pixel data from a fixed-size surface anyway, that shouldn't
matter much in practice.
Not to mention that the function is only used for fallback X11 icons,
which are already shit more often than not.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1342
On the one hand, this is a bit of a stretch: StImageContent is what
we create from GIcons.
But on the other hand, there's some justification: StImageContent does
represent an image (and likely icon) after all, and there's some
precedent with GdkPixbuf.
In the end as we don't care about serialization or loading from other
API, we can go with a very crude implementation that allows us to
pass out a content as GIcon and use it directly when "loading" it.
We will use that soon to represent X11 window icons as GIcons, which
in turn will allow us to unify app icon handling.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1342
