Currently, "-st-shadow" can mean one of three very
different things:
1) shadow based on alpha of the background image
2) shadow the "border box" of the node
3) shadow applied to the content of a StIcon
It isn't well defined which of the above 3 cases
-st-shadow will mean for any given node, however.
This commit splits the property into three
different properties, "box-shadow",
"-st-background-image-shadow", and "icon-shadow"
to make it all very explicit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636976
A new StIconColors object is used to efficiently track the colors
we need to colorize a symbolic icon.
st_theme_node_compute_icon_colors() is added to compute the
StIconColors for a theme node. (Refcounting of StIconColors means
that we'll typically share the colors object of the parent node.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633865
* Make sure all source files have a LGPL copyright header, and standardize
non-standard variations of the header to a common form.
* Check and update all copyright notices.
* Remove 'Written By:' lines. They are universally incomplete and
typically indicate only who started a particular file.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634550
Although within St itself there are situations where the semantics of
these functions (return TRUE or FALSE and return the actual value in
an out parameter) is useful, it's mostly just annoying at the
application level, where you generally know that the CSS property is
going to specified, and there is no especially sane fallback if it's
not.
So rename the current methods to lookup_color, lookup_double, and
lookup_length, and add new get_color, get_double, and get_length
methods that don't take an "inherit" parameter, and return their
values directly. (Well, except for get_color, due to the lack of (out
caller-allocates) in gjs.)
And update the code to use either the old or new methods as appropriate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632590
Reorganize the existing code which parses the -st-shadow property
to allow parsing different shadow properties and add support for
the text-shadow property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624384
Add st_theme_node_paint_equal() and use that to do two things:
1) Avoid animating transitions where nothing changes.
2) Copy cached painting state from the old theme node to the new
theme node.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627083
"text-align" allows setting the alignment of text, with respect to
other lines and allocated space, without requiring a reference to
the ClutterText (which is private for most widgets).
If not specified, all text is left-aligned.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622447
StThemeNodes may have properties - namely shadows - which paint
outside an actor's allocation. This is not a problem unless drawing
is redirected to an offscreen buffer, in which case the actually
painted size is needed in advance when setting up the buffer.
Add a convenience method to calculate an allocation large enough to
paint the node.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619025
Add st_theme_node_equal() - two nodes are considered equal iff they
refer to identical elements, so e.g. .example and .example:hover are
not equal, even if no .example:hover rule exists in the CSS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619025
The idea behind this move is that we have a lot more control over
rendering if StWidget isn't a big pile of actors, and things are
more efficient.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607500
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_width/height now limit the content area
of an actor to the max, if given. (The requested width/height may be
larger to make room for borders, etc.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606755
Some theme authors have stated interest in radial gradient backgrounds.
The w3c has some draft:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#radial-gradients
As this is rather complex, we add only some very basic support, which
extends our syntax for linear gradients:
background-gradient-direction: [vertical|horizontal|radial]
Gradients are centered circles, whose size is determined by the closest
side.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604945
Add support for a new -st-shadow property, which is based loosely
on the CSS3 box-shadow property:
http://www.css3.info/preview/box-shadow/
It defers from the specification as follows:
* no multiple shadows
* the optional color argument may be placed anywhere
* the shape is not determined by the widget's bounding box,
but by the background-image property
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603691
Rather than having gradients be individually implemented by higher
level JS widgets, move basic gradient functionality into StWidget.
There is prior art in WebKit for CSS gradients:
http://webkit.org/blog/175/introducing-css-gradients/
However, implementing this would be quite a lot of work; all we
need in the Shell design at the moment is basic horizontal/vertical
linear gradients. So, the syntax now supported is:
background-gradient-type: [vertical|horizontal]
background-gradient-start: color;
background-gradient-end: color;
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602131
The behavior in respect to borders matches CSS - the properties set the size of
the content exclusive of the borders (CSS3 box-sizing property - not implemented
here - changes this).
min-width/min-height correspond very closely to the CSS meanings.
width/height are a little different from the CSS meanings - the CSS meaning is
"exactly this size unless overridden by min/max-width/height" - but within the
realm of our layout algorithm, making them control natural size is pretty
close.
This way we can force elements to have a fixed natural or minimum size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598651
The current CSS3 border-image is close to a superset of what we were
doing for -hippo-background-image. Woot! rename StThemeImage to
StBorderImage and change parsing to look for:
border-image: <url> <number>...
Rather than
-st-background-image: <url> <length>...
percentanges for the border sizes are not currently supported, neither
are the keywords for handling of the middle part. We always do 'stretch'
for now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595990
Rather than repeating the computation of borders in many different
widget subclasses, add helper functions:
st_theme_node_adjust_for_height()
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_width()
st_theme_node_adjust_for_width()
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_height()
st_theme_node_get_content_box()
That are used in get_preferred_width()/get_preferred_height() and
allocate() methods to consistently apply the necessary adjustments.
This allows removing the StPadding type.
Queueing a relayout when the borders/padding change is moved from
st_widget_real_style_changed() to the invoking code to allow access
to the old StThemeNode for comparison. (Should this be added as
a parameter to the signal?)
Borders are included in the geometry adjustments, but borders
are not yet drawn.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595993
Add support for parsing and caching the border-radius property.
Different radii for the 4 corners are supported; elliptical corners
are not supported.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595993
Add support for passing an inline-style string when creating a
StThemeNode.
Hook this up to a new 'style' property of StWidget.
Add a test case that demonstrates using this to update font sizes
on the fly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595991
Import:
HippoCanvasTheme => StTheme
HippoCanvasThemeImage => StThemeImage
HippoCanvasStyle => StThemeNode
StThemeContext is a new class managing the theme for a stage and
global properties like resolution.
test-theme.c is a newly written test program to do verification of the
style matching and property handling rules.
Various changes are made in the import:
- Comprehensive reindentation
- guint32 pixels replaced with ClutterColor
- General pseudo-class support added
- Old-fashioned (non-bordered) background image support added, though
with no support for repeat, etc.
- Bug fixes for problems revealed by test program
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=595990
