The test doesn't look and behave like before, but they are
already broken in master anyway. This commit makes it work
without Shell.GenericContainer, but the test itself remains
to be fixed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/153
When not using arrow notation with anonymous functions, we use Lang.bind()
to bind `this` to named callbacks. However since ES5, this functionality
is already provided by Function.prototype.bind() - in fact, Lang.bind()
itself uses it when no extra arguments are specified. Just use the built-in
function directly where possible, and use arrow notation in the few places
where we pass additional arguments.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23
GTK+ added a new PolicyType which currently triggers compiler warnings
about unhandled values in switch statements. We also have a use case for
it already, so add support for the new policy type.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739379
It is the job of layout containers to arrange their children; having
a hidden feature that *also* allows children to be positioned freely
outside the parent's allocation is just odd.
With the last user of the feature gone, kill it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703808
If enabled, scrollbars take away from the allocation given to the
view's content. This is usually preferrable to painting the bars on
top of the content, but there are exceptions, for instance when the
content needs to be centered with regard to the view as a whole.
Add a :overlay-scrollbars property to account for those cases.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694261
Reposition the window overlay when the title changes, using the current
transformed size of the window clone.
Includes a test that changes title to a string of random length every 3 seconds.
Based on a patch by Alex Hultman <alexhultman@gmail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620874
Add support for the CSS "background-repeat" property. Currently, this
only supports on/off, rather than allowing tiling in each individual
dimension. It is supported for both the cogl and cairo rendering paths.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680801
Implement the background-size CSS property, specified by the CSS
Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3, including the keywords
"contain", "cover", and fixed-size backgrounds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633462
js2-mode is no longer developed and we recommend js-mode these days,
so switch the modelines to specify that, and make them consistent
across all files.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660358
Theme authors now have the power (and responsibility) of creating fade
effects with the new CSS length property '-st-fade-offset'. A value of
0 disables the effect.
This new CSS approach replaces the current programmatic toggle of
the 'vfade' property. A new CSS style class name 'vfade' is used as
a replacement for the old property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651813
The original support for CSS based shadows has been extended with
support for an optional spread radius and the 'inset' keyword,
so with the additional complexity a dedicated test case looks
appropriate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642334
Currently, "-st-shadow" can mean one of three very
different things:
1) shadow based on alpha of the background image
2) shadow the "border box" of the node
3) shadow applied to the content of a StIcon
It isn't well defined which of the above 3 cases
-st-shadow will mean for any given node, however.
This commit splits the property into three
different properties, "box-shadow",
"-st-background-image-shadow", and "icon-shadow"
to make it all very explicit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636976
This commit adds a few more examples to borders.js
that render borders with various combinations of
gradients, background images, shadows, and
border-images.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636976
In both tests the scrolled actor's width was fixed to the stage
width, so that the scroll bars ended up outside the visible area.
Fix by adding an outer container with a fixed width and expanding
the scroll view to fill the available area.
While non-uniform border widths were parsed correctly, an arbitrary
side's width was picked when painting, so that each border ended up
with the same width and the widths specified in CSS were ignored.
At least for sides between non-rounded corners, using a different
border width can be reasonable, for instance at screen edges.
Different border widths around rounded corners are kind of crack,
but then it would be lame not to support it ...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607500
