The old formula worked only when the primary monitor was positioned at the
top of the virtual desktop. When that was not the case, the available
space was miscalculated sometimes resulting in negative numbers, which in
the end produced strangely vertically stretched window thumbnails.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651130
Now that ClutterActor has a ClutterContainer implementation, we
can start removing StContainer. To help make this a bit more
understandable, instead of converting everything at once, make
StContainer a compatible API wrapper around the ClutterActor
implementation, and then we'll remove those wrappers in later
commits.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Since an StWidget now has children, it needs to allocate those children
properly. Defer to the currently installed layout manager, like Clutter
does.
Now that we have something that allocates children in St, to prevent
double allocations, we use clutter_actor_set_allocation rather than
chaining up to StWidget::allocate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Now that StWidget is concrete and instantiable, we need to do something
other than return an adjusted 0 for width and height. Just chain up
to ClutterActor's default implementation, which uses the layout manager.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Since we want to paint children by default in StWidget, we need to
provide a way for custom subclasses to paint their CSS backgrounds
without painting children... introducing st_widget_paint_background.
Additionally, remove any custom paint/pick handlers added by subclasses
of StWidget that just painted their children. This will cause double
painting if left alone.
This also removes the hacky things that some subclasses of StBin did
to prevent their one child to be painted by StBin.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Clutter now provides two new properties on ClutterActor - first-child
and last-child, so we have notifiers on when they change. Unfortunately,
it still doesn't help us too much - we need to keep track of the previous
values of the properties so we can remove their pseudoclasses.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
We can't get rid of the implementations in StContainer just yet,
as StContainer still keeps its own child list. But this should
lower the amount of code that has to be moved around when we
remove StContainer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
clutter_container_foreach is deprecated, so let's replace that
with some ClutterActorIter usage. Additionally, remove the checks
for ClutterContainer, as all ClutterActors are now ClutterContainers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670034
Although not all "Finding and reminding" applications are ready
yet, the integration with gnome-documents' search results overlaps
enough with the "Recent Items" provider to justify its removal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670150
Allow applications to register search providers by dropping a keyfile
into a well-known directory. For now, initialize all found providers;
long term, we probably want to give users the ability to restrict the
set of active search providers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663125
Add an asynchronous search provider for results from a DBus service
implementing the org.gnome.Shell.SearchProvider interface; this
will allow applications to hook into the Shell's search without
implementing it in Shell itself or requiring an extension.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663125
We will allow applications to hook into shell's search by registering
a service which implements a well-known DBus interface.
"search-providers" is a reasonable directory name for applications to
drop their registration files, but it conflicts with "search_providers"
used by open search providers - rename the latter to avoid confusion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663125
Currently, asynchronous search providers are expected to call
startAsync() in getInitialResultSet()/getSubsearchResultSet(),
which will trigger async mode until the search is canceled or
updated. Switching between synchronous and asynchronous mode like
this makes asynchronous search an implementation detail, but being
transparent to the searchDisplay means that certain optimizations
don't work as expected. Namely, updating asynchronous search results
causes flickering, and the automatic selection never focuses
asynchronous results.
So change the API to require providers being either synchronous (with
the current getInitialResultSet()/getSubsearchResultSet() methods)
or asynchronous (with asynchronous variants), and handle asynchronous
providers explicitly in searchDisplay.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663125
renderResults() updates the results set, determines the number of
results to display, retrieves the corresponding result metas and
adds a new results actor for each meta.
Splitting the function in those parts allows to move the retrieval
of the result metas into SearchResults, which is where we ensure
flicker-free rendering and control the selection - we want to keep
both features for asynchronous result metas which we are about to
introduce.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=663125
Empathy uses to support 2 D-Bus API for calls:
- StreamedMedia: legacy API
- Call.DRAFT: experimental version of the new API
Since 3.3.90, Empathy only supports Call1, the first stable version of the new
API, so the Shell should do the same.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=667694
While it's extremely unlikely that document.location would not be an
object in the browser setting, this check is incorrect and we could
possibly crash an NPAPI host if this is the case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670489
Add a new dbus method that takes an area (x, y, width, height) and fires a
flashspot on it.
This would be useful for applications like totem and cheese.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=669660
The function may return FALSE without setting the GError, so don't
assume it is set to prevent a crash in that case. While at it, free
the GError we were leaking before.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=670418
