As per previous commit the user can cancel an ongoing authentication via
Escape key and that will always send the user back to the clock view in
lockscreen or user-selection view in login prompt.
However, we can be a little more permissive and don't switch view to be
able to restart the authentication without further action.
To avoid this to be abused though, we consider the user verification
cancellation via escape key to be a "soft-failure", so once the
configured "allowed-failures" gsettings value has been reached, we'd
just act as before, ignoring any further request (until we don't get
back to the user auth view).
In this way we still make brute-force attacks harder to do, while still
giving the well-behaving user some ability to fix mistakes.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
Escape key is supposed to cancel a verification, however if the user
already hit Enter to begin the authentication the Escape key won't work
until the verification completed.
This may be quite inconvenient when an user did a typo while writing and
wants to cancel the already started auth.
So, while authenticating (or in general while the entry is unsensitive)
give the key focus to the authpromt itself so that we can still get the
input events and cancel an user action.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
When a cancel event in the user lockscreen happens we first emit a reset
signal and immediately a cancelled one.
This lead to start a new gdm worker for each enabled authentication
method and then immediately to stop it.
As per the previous commit, we don't have anymore dangling gdm workers
around, but still we should not even start a new one in such case.
So, when the user explicitly cancelled the authentication session, first
emit a cancelled event and only emit a reset event with a begin request
if we are outside the lockscreen.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
When we cancel an user authentication via Escape key or cancel button on
AuthPrompt we reset the view and we emit a 'cancelled' signal that leads
to destroying the auth prompt and the user verifier.
However, the verifier may still have an operation in progress and its
completion may take some time (as in the case of gdm-fingerprint), but
we just leave the gdm worker running until its pam module completes
(potentially never) clearing and disposing its handle.
So, instead of just clearing the verify, actually cancel and clear it.
In case the user verifier is set, clearing the relevant data will happen
anyway as part of the cancel() call.
Ideally this would have been handled by gdm itself, but unfortunately we
can't fix it there because the verifier itself is a class generated by
gdbus-codegen, so we can't handle this automatically on disposal nor we
can automatically monitor when the caller proxy is stopped on our side.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3654
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1622>
The reason this wasn't using the Gio.DBus.makeProxyWrapper() convenience API is that it passes custom flags to the proxy, and that wasn't supported by the wrapper at the time.
As this is now possible, this commit migrates us to the new API.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1572>
Plain classes are private to their file, so accessing them from
another module results in the following warning:
That property was defined with 'let' or 'const' inside the module.
This was previously supported, but is not correct according to the
ES6 standard.
Fix by assigning the class to a public variable instead.
(Eventually switching to ES6 modules with proper imports/exports will
fix this as well)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1512>
The purpose of password peeking is to spot and correct errors;
the latter isn't possible when the entry is non-editable, so
we can hide the password again while authentication is ongoing.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3138
At the moment, if a user switches to the login screen vt,
the login screen fades in whatever was on screen prior, and
then does a reset.
It makes more sense to reset first, so we fade in what the
user is going to interact with instead of what they interacted
with before.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2997
The previous commit implemented a new CredentialManager interface to
facilitate adding additional providers for pre-authenticating the user
at the login screen.
This commit implements a new credential manager using that interface
for vmware deployments.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1983
Commit 4cda61a1 added support for pre-authenticated logins in
oVirt environments. This feature prevents a user from having
to type their password twice (once to the oVirt management machine,
and then immediately again in the provisioned guest running gnome-shell).
That feature is currently oVirt specific, but a similar feature would
be useful in non-oVirt based virt farm environments.
Toward that end, this commit generalizes the various aspects of the
oVirt integration code, so that it can be reused in a subsequent
commit for adding single sign on support in vmware deployments, too.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1983
ClutterActor provides the same function, but with a different return
value. So since we already switched to the ClutterActor implementation
in our C code, we can now safely remove st_widget_get_resource_scale()
and update the JS code that's still using the old API.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1287
We currently let the entry of the autoPrompt grab the key focus inside
setQuestion(), which is called from _onAskQuestion(), which is the
callback of the "ask-question" signal.
It seems that the "ask-question" signal isn't emitted again right after
the password-check failed, but a few seconds after that. Since we get
the "verification-failed" signal earlier than "ask-question" (right
after we know the check failed) and we also get a hint whether the entry
should be usable again with the canRetry argument, we can also grab key
focus to in the same step.
So do that by grabbing key focus when making the entry sensitive.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2655
We want the spinner to be centered with regard to the entry, but
constraining the height breaks that:
1. clutter_actor_allocate() is called with the available size
2. clutter_actor_update_constraints() then adjusts that according
to the constraints
3. clutter_actor_adjust_allocation() applies the margin/expand/align
properties.
The issue there is that 2. reduces the allocation to the desired size,
so there is no more extra space to distribute in 3.
We can fix this by either constraining everything (and rely on the
cancel button's alignment) or limit the constraint to the width. The
latter seems more appropriate, given that the constraint is only used
to center the entry horizontally.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2628
Promises make asynchronous operations easier to manage, in particular
when used through the async/await syntax that allows for asynchronous
code to closely resemble synchronous one.
gjs has included a Gio._promisify() helper for a while now, which
monkey-patches methods that follow GIO's async pattern to return a
Promise when called without a callback argument.
Use that to get rid of all those GAsyncReadyCallbacks!
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1126
Commit 55b57421d changed signal handlers to the corresponding vfuncs,
but didn't always chain up as necessary. In most places this doesn't
matter, but at the very least the commit broke activating message list
items via the keyboard.
Add all (hopefully) the missing chain-ups to get the expected behavior
back.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2319
Visually the button is just an interactive label, so having the
interactive area extend to the empty space next to the label
is surprising.
Instead, left-align the whole button rather than just the label
inside, so the clickable area corresponds to the visible one.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1046
We turned both the auth prompt's cancel button and the switch user
button into icon buttons now, which means they are completely cryptic
when using a screen reader.
Just use the previously used labels as accessible names, which has the
nice side effect of lowering the impact of the string freeze break.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
The button is hidden on the lock screen, so it shouldn't be allowed to
activate it, be it via click or keyboard. The latter is still possible
by keynaving to the button and hitting space/enter. Fix that by making
the button unfocusable when we make it unreactive.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
xgettext gained some support for template strings, and no longer
fails when encountering '/' somewhere between backticks.
Unfortunately its support is still buggy as hell, and it is now
silently dropping translatable strings, yay. I hate making the
code worse, but until xgettext really gets its shit together,
the only viable way forward seems to be to not use template
strings in any files listed in POTFILES.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1014
The design team discussed the ellipses at the end of the hint text of
our entries and, even though they are present in most mockups, it turned
out they don't like them, so remove them.
It also turned out they don't like the prefixes like "Enter" before it,
so remove those, too.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/977
We don't want to show a caps-lock warning when showing a non-password
entry, but we also don't want the layout to jump when changing the
label's visibility.
Achieve that by inserting an empty placeholder label that we can
show whenever the caps-lock warning is hidden.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
Usually, logging in or unlocking the session is made asynchronously,
and AuthPrompt properly manages which entry is currently visible.
External code don't rely on any specific entry to be set, since it
is AuthPrompt's responsibility to select the correct one to be shown.
However, there's one specific case where AuthPrompt must preserve
the password entry: on reset. The reset code preserved whatever
entry was currently displayed, but after fe69dacaf1, it always
changes to the username entry.
Make sure to show the password entry on reset.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
In the past, the session menu button was part of the auth prompt widgetry,
so we didn't have to manually hide it when showing the user list. However,
now it is part of the login screen itself.
Hide the session menu button when the user list is shown.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
Hiding the Caps lock warning label changes the layout of
Auth Prompt. This is specially noticeable when logging in
with unlisted users, where we change the visibility of this
label after typing a username, and the whole user widget
moves a bit.
Change the Cap lock label's opacity instead of hiding it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, AuthPrompt is connecting to its own 'next' signal
signal to react to any of the entries being activated, and do
some actions like starting the spinner and answering the PAM
question.
Refactor this code into another method, and don't connect to
our own signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Unfortunately, the question that is displayed comes directly
from PAM. It usually is just "Password:", which comes from
pam-unix, but other questions can be set, usually with the
colons, since they are crafted with a CLI workflow in mind.
Manually drop the colons from questions asked by PAM. This
is also done by the PolKit agent, which shows how the stack
is fragile, but it's what we have for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
This is a regression from the transition to password entry. Both
entries need to be connected to the relevant signals, otherwise
username-based login won't ever work.
Connect both the text and the password entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, there is a dedicated label above the entry to
display the question text. According to the new mockups
for the lock screen, this label doesn't exist; instead,
the question is set inside the entry itself, as a hint
text.
Set the questions as hint texts of the entry, and remove
the now unused label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
