Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent on whether case labels share the same
indentation level as the corresponding switch statement or not. gjs
goes with the default of no additional indentation, so go along with
that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
Starting an object literal with a comment throws off eslint's rules
for brace style (newline between brace and properties for both opening
and closing brace or neither) as well as indentation (fixed four-space
indent or align with the previous argument).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
Using multiple spaces after property names in order to align the
values isn't something we do elsewhere.
Instead, align the values by using a fixed 4-space indent as preferred
by gjs nowadays.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
The current code is carefully avoiding an overly wide line length as
well as adding literal new lines to the string due to indentation. It's
clever and barely legible.
Instead, use one string per line similar to how they appear in the actual
output, and join them together when setting the clipboard text.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
When destructuring multiple return values, we often use trailing commas
to indicate that there are additional elements that we are ignoring.
There isn't anything inherently wrong with that, but it's a style that's
too confusing for eslint - on the one hand we require a space after a
comma, on the other hand we require no space before closing brackets.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
We are currently inconsistent with whether or not to put a space
after catch clauses. While the predominant style is to omit it,
that's inconsistent with the style we use for any other statement.
There's not really a good reason to stick with it, so switch to
the style gjs/eslint default to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
While allowed by the syntax, they are problematic because the
variable is in the scope of the switch() statement, but only
valid if a particular case clause is reached.
Add braces to limit the variables' scope to the corresponding
case clause to avoid that problem.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
Converting a variable to a particular type can be done explicitly (with
functions like Number() or toString()) or implicitly by relying on type
coercion (like concatenating a variable to the empty string to force
a string, or multiplying it with 1 to force a number).
As those tend to be less readable and clear, they are best avoided. So
replace the cases of string coercion we use with template strings, and
clarify the places that can be confused with number coercion.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
We can use that newer method where we don't care about the actual position
of an element inside the array.
(Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() do behave differently in edge cases,
for example in the handling of NaN, but those don't matter to us)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/152
Control flow statements like return, break or continue are considered
unsafe in finally blocks, as they take precendence over any control
flow statement in the try and catch blocks, which may be unexpected.
This isn't the case here as the statement in the finally block is the
only one, but we can just as well avoid the finally block altogether
and use a regular return statement.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/606
This vfunc override has been introduced to ensure app icons are always
squared, but since the container of the AppIcon gets a square allocation
anyway if the 'square' property of the SwitcherButton is set, there's
no need to return a special width here.
Without the override we can also stop setting the size of the iconBin
manually. And since shell_app_create_icon_texture() uses logical pixels
but clutter_actor_set_size() uses screen pixels, that means we now no
longer set the size of the icon back to the unscaled value after it was
already correct.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1325
We're calculating icon sizes for the alt tab switcher early and at a
point where the style attributes of this._list are not loaded yet. To
make sure the value of this._list.spacing is correct, call
ensure_style() on this._list before accessing the spacing.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/587
The polkit password dialog has a spinner that gets displayed
while the users password is being verified.
Unfortunately, the spinner stop method unintentionally calls
back into itself after the stop fade out animation is complete.
The stop method is called at startup, so the looping begins as
soon as the dialog is visible and continues until the dialog is
dismissed.
This commit fixes the loop by having the stop method cease
calling itself, and instead having it call the stop method on the
superclass.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/602
The polkit password dialog has a spinner that gets displayed
while the users password is being verified.
Unfortunately, the spinner stop method unintentionally calls
back into itself after the stop fade out animation is complete.
The stop method is called at startup, so the looping begins as
soon as the dialog is visible and continues until the dialog is
dismissed.
This commit fixes the loop by having the stop method cease
calling itself, and instead having it call the stop method on the
superclass.
While the confirmation dialog for extension installation is simpler
than - say - authentication dialogs, it still makes sense to re-use
the common content layout instead of duplicating it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/600
Using one variable to initialize all gestures will update the address of
the "gesture" pointer with every newly initialized object. This means
that event handlers which also use the "gesture" pointer like the
'keyboard-visible-changed' handler will update a different gesture as
soon as the pointer is changed.
This lead to a bug where the handler of 'keyboard-visible-changed'
wrongly nabled the unfullscreen gesture. Fix that by assigning each
gesture its own variable.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/598
