After dropping an application into the folder icon, the
list of applications is updated but the folder icon itself
is not.
Introduce BaseIcon.update() and call it from FolderIcon
when redisplaying.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/603
The event blocker is an actor that is added in between the
icon grid and the app folder popup in order to guarantee
that clicking outside the app folder will collapse it.
However, the next patch will require allowing dragging events
to be passed to folder icons, and the event blocker gets in
our way here, preventing drag n' drop to work properly.
Add an API to inhibit the event blocker. This API will be
used by the app folders while an item is dragged.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/603
Now that redisplaying is a lightweight operation that only
adds and removes what changed, we don't need to just refilter
the app icons in AllView when a folder changes.
Call _redisplay() in AllView when folders change.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
FolderView and AllView currently check if the item is
present in the BaseAppView._items map, in order to avoid
adding the same icon multiple times.
Now that BaseAppView._loadGrid() has a different role
-- it returns a list with all app icons, and BaseAppView
diffs with the current list of app icons -- checking the
BaseAppView._items map is wrong.
Make sure there are no duplicated items in the temporary
array returned by all _loadGrid() implementations. Remove
the now unused BaseAppView.hasItem() method.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
BaseAppView currently removes all icons, and readds them, every
time the list of app icons needs to be redisplayed. In order to
allow animating app icon positions in the future, however, we
cannot destroy the actors of the app icons.
Previous commits paved the way for us to do differential loading,
i.e. add only the icons that were added, and remove only what was
removed.
Make the BaseAppView effectively implement differential loading.
The BaseAppView.removeAll() method is removed, since we do not
remove all icons anymore. BaseAppView._loadApps() now returns an
array with the new apps, instead of putting them directly at the
BaseAppView lists.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
In the close future, BaseAppView will only add new icons (compared
to the remove all + readd all approach that is now). With that, the
items in the this._allItems array will be iterated multiple times,
but items can only be added once, and in the order they're in the
array.
Add the items in the this._allItems array passing the index they
should be added, and don't add icons with a parent already set.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
Now that the three views follow the exact same loading routine
(remove all + load apps + load grid), we don't need each view
call loadGrid() directly anymore.
This is an important step in order to animate adding and removing
icons, since now we can diff old and new app icons properly.
Move all calls to BaseAppView.loadGrid() to a single one after
BaseAppView._loadApps(). Also add the underscore prefix, since
this is now considered a protected function.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
FrequentView is another view that is slightly not unified with how
BaseAppView expects subclasses to load app icons. Instead of using
BaseAppView.addItem() and then calling BaseAppview.loadGrid(), it
adds the app icons directly to the icon grid.
Make FrequentView add icons using BaseAppview.addItem(), and load
the icons using BaseAppView.loadGrid().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
Future patches will diff the old and new icons of views, in order to
animate them when necessary (e.g. adding an app icon to a folder, or
from a folder back to the app grid). In order to do that, all views
must be streamlined in how they load app icons.
Currently, FrequentView and AllView are already following the behavior
expected by BaseAppView, but FolderView isn't. Its icons are loaded by
FolderIcon, and FolderView doesn't implement BaseView._loadApps(),
which makes it impossible to diff old and new apps.
Move the app icon loading routine from FolderIcon to FolderView, by
implementing the _loadApps() method.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/645
AppIcon makes itself draggable, and handles the various DnD
routines such as 'drag-begin' and 'drag-end' by making the
Overview emit the appropriate signals.
However, when destroyed, the AppIcon does not try to finish
any drag operations that started. That causes the event
blocker in AllView not to be updated correctly when dragging
icons to outside folders.
Make AppIcon emit 'item-drag-end' when a drag operation
started and it's destroyed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/643
While we aren't using those destructured variables, they are still useful
to document the meaning of those elements. We don't want eslint to keep
warning about them though, so mark them accordingly.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
Those unused arguments aren't bugs - unbeknownst to eslint, they all
correspond to valid signal parameters - but they don't contribute
anything to clarity, so just remove them anyway.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
At the moment the only way to open a folder icon is to click on it;
there's no API to open the icon programmatically.
This commits adds an open method and makes the click handler use
it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/628
When a FolderIcon is opened, it asks the parent view to allocate
space for it, which takes time. Eventually, the space-ready
signal is emitted on the view and the icon can make use of the new
space with its popup. If the icon gets destroyed in the
interim, though, space-ready signal handler still fires.
This commit disconnects the signal handler so it doesn't get called
on a destroyed icon.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/628
It is important that the FolderView of a FolderIcon always
gets destroyed before the AppFolderPopup, since the view
may or may not be in the popup, and the view should
get cleaned up exactly once in either case.
This commit adds a destroy handler on FolderIcon to ensure
things get taken down in the right order, and to make sure
the view isn't leaked if it's not yet part of the popup.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/628
At the moment AppFolderPopup calls popdown on destruction,
which leads to open-state-changed getting emitted after
the actor associated with the popup is destroyed.
This commit handles ungrabbing and closing from an
actor destroy handler to side-step the open-state-changed
signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/628
If an icon already exists in an app view with the same id, the
duplicate is not added on a call to addItem. Unfortunately,
since it's not added, the icon actor gets orphaned and leaked.
This commit address the problem by introducing a new hasItem
method and disallowing callers to call addItem with a duplicate
in the first place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/628
meta_later_add() is modelled after g_idle_add() and friends, and
the handler's boolean return value determines whether it should
be scheduled again or removed. There are some places where we omit
the return value, add them (although the implicit return value of
"undefined" already gives us the intended result).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/637
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent on whether case labels share the same
indentation level as the corresponding switch statement or not. gjs
goes with the default of no additional indentation, so go along with
that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent with whether or not to put a space
after catch clauses. While the predominant style is to omit it,
that's inconsistent with the style we use for any other statement.
There's not really a good reason to stick with it, so switch to
the style gjs/eslint default to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
We can use that newer method where we don't care about the actual position
of an element inside the array.
(Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() do behave differently in edge cases,
for example in the handling of NaN, but those don't matter to us)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/152
AllView's adaptToSize is called as part of viewStack allocation vfunc, and this
makes the adjustment value to be reset while relayouting.
So, fix this by delaying this using the Meta later that we already had for
pageIndicators operations.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1392
In order to cater for emoji panel usage, we want something like PageIndicators
except:
- It should have horizontal disposition
- It should not be animatable (?)
- It should not be reactive
Separated PageIndicators into a base, non-animated widget, and an
AnimatedPageIndicators that can be used on appDisplay.js. Reactiveness is
set through an extra method, and layout is set as a construct argument.
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkDirectionType. It's bit-compatible with it,
too. All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkPolicyType. It's bit-compatible with it, too.
All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
