When making any D-Bus call through the GDBus' proxy wrapper with an
invalid D-Bus object path, gnome-shell hangs.
Supposedly FdoApplicationProxy constructor should validate the passed
D-Bus object path and throw an error if the path is invalid. Since it
does not do that, we work it around by making sure that the deduced
D-Bus object path is valid or throw an exception if the path is not.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787902
Some application IDs contain hyphens, which are not allowed in D-Bus object
paths, so we need to update the translation by converting them to something
that's a valid object path. This is consistent with what GApplication does.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=787902
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
GNotifications are persistent until dismissed or withdrawn, including
across restarts. As we show the time a notification was received in the
calendar, we need to include that information when serializing the
notification in order to be correct.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775799
The following code is a syntax error in ES6:
let a = 'something';
let a = 'other thing';
Previously GJS would silently accept this code, but in the next release the
SpiderMonkey JS engine will be more ES6-compliant.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=778425
When a GNotification has the same ID as a previous one, it should
be shown as a new notification after withdrawing the old one.
However for this to work, we must not destroy the corresponding
source if withdrawing the old notification lets the notification
count drop to zero, so make sure the source is kept alive until
the replace operation has completed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775149
Clicking on calendar notifications might block till the DBus request times
out if the application being poked happens to be non-responsive. Perform
this asynchronously so we don't block if that is the case.
No Source subclass used it to do anything special, and with sources
no longer having any UI representation on their own, doing anything
else isn't useful either, so just kill off that hook.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744850
There is not good reason why activating a GTK+ notification should
behave fundamentally different from fd.o notifications - we don't
raise the app because we expect it to perform an appropriate action,
but that does not include closing overview or calendar for us ...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744817
Just like we leave the overview when activating a notification,
the calendar popup should be closed - after all, the only case
where the calendar is open when a notification's default action
is activated is the user clicking an entry in the message list's
notification section.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744817
When we will start to show notifications in the date drop-down, we
will not use the actual notification actor, but construct our own UI
based on Calendar.Message. This is similar to what we already do in
the lock screen, except that in this case clicking the notification
should activate the default action.
So rename the existing _onClicked() method to activate() to make it
clear that such use is acceptable. While not strictly necessary, also
rename the corresponding signal to match.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744817
This capability was only really useful for media players, and with
music notifications no longer being special, we can simplify a bit
by removing support for it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744815
Music is no longer a special type of notification according
to the design. If we want to resurrect the functionality, we
can reimplement it with a dedicated API like MPRIS rather
than piggy-bagging on the notification system.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744815
Tray icons make for a terrible UI on their own, but trying to
shoehorn them into the notification system has only made them
worse. At least for the time being this removal is temporary
and support for tray icons will be back, but no longer as part
of the notification system.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744815
As far as I can tell, the only behavior change of a transient source
is that they auto-destroy after viewing their summary box pointer.
Since all transient sources are only associated with transient
notifications, it seems that we can never get to their summary box
pointer in the first place! Remove support for this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710115
While the existing comment is correct in that a source's notifications
will be destroyed first, the code takes a shortcut which prevents the
Source::count-updated signal from being emitted. Given that the purpose
of the signal is to keep notification counters up-to-date which is
pointless when the source is about to be destroyed, the shortcut makes
sense; just save notifications explicitly in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710596
The new API is designed to support features like persistence and uses
the new org.freedesktop.Application specification for activating
actions on notifications. While we won't add support for persistence
yet, implement the new notification spec with parity of the old one.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710137
Some consumers may want to construct their buttons specially, so allow them
to do that by adding a new API that takes a button instead of a label.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710137
Destroying the notification will make the key focus be reset to NULL, which
means that gnome-shell will try to focus the MRU window, thinking the user is
done interacting and wants to go back to whatever they were doing.
Unfortunately, since we focus two windows at the same time, they will have
the same timestamp, meaning that the window that actually gets focused will
be a race as to whoever responds to their WM_TAKE_FOCUS event last.
If we explicitly set the focus beforehand, then gnome-shell will believe it
got key focus taken away from it, and won't try to focus the MRU when the
key focus drops to NULL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703265
