We split the search string into words using whitespace, while
GLib.tokenize_and_fold() splits on any non-alphanumeric characters.
That is, a valid search term like ',' will be tokenized as [], so
the original non-empty terms may get mapped to an empty array.
And as [].every() returns true for any condition[0], we end up
matching *all* system actions in that case. We want the exact
opposite and not return any results, so handle that case explicitly.
[0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Global_Objects/Array/everyhttps://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3169
Changing the icon to 'system-log-out-symbolic' has no visual
change in a default GNOME setup since both 'system-log-out-symbolic'
and 'application-exit-symbolic' are the same in adwaita-icon-theme
(at the time of writing), however, other icon themes differentiate
between the two icons so pointing to the appropriate icon name
is the right thing to do.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2751
xgettext gained some support for template strings, and no longer
fails when encountering '/' somewhere between backticks.
Unfortunately its support is still buggy as hell, and it is now
silently dropping translatable strings, yay. I hate making the
code worse, but until xgettext really gets its shit together,
the only viable way forward seems to be to not use template
strings in any files listed in POTFILES.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1014
Since the orientation lock menu entry is a proper menu entry instead of
a icon-only button now, we also show a description-text for that entry,
so update this text depending on whether orientation is locked or not to
better reflect what clicking the menu entry will do.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/964
Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
When plugging in a device with sensors that are unsupported by
iio-sensor-proxy, the proxy may quit so fast that the name disappears
from the bus before we get to construct the SensorProxy in response
to the name-appeared handler, resulting in the following warning:
JS ERROR: TypeError: this._sensorProxy is null
_sensorProxyAppeared/this._sensorProxy<@resource:///org/gnome/shell/misc/systemActions.js:217:17
_makeProxyWrapper/</<@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/overrides/Gio.js:243:21
Address this by creating the proxy unconditionally instead of monitoring
the bus name, and using the g-name-owner property to determine whether
iio-sensor-proxy is active.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1357
For GObject properties, we follow the convention of all-lowercase,
dash-separated names. Those translate to underscores in getters/setters,
so exempt them from the newly added "camelcase" rule.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent on whether case labels share the same
indentation level as the corresponding switch statement or not. gjs
goes with the default of no additional indentation, so go along with
that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
Starting an object literal with a comment throws off eslint's rules
for brace style (newline between brace and properties for both opening
and closing brace or neither) as well as indentation (fixed four-space
indent or align with the previous argument).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
Our search for system actions is currently inconsistent with searching
for applications: While we match terms anywhere within keywords, GIO
will only match at the beginning of words.
In order to get the same behavior, split keywords into single words
and only match terms at the beginning of a word.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/745
Every action has specific associated terms that
identify that action and show it in the search
results. Methods to match the actions as well
as getting properties of specific actions are
needed in order to provide a way of using the
actions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691900
We want to be able to search for available system actions, so
rather than tracking each action in a separate property, store
them in a single map that can be searched in a generic and clean
way.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691900
In anticipation of showing the system actions in
the search results, it is fit to move action
specific code to its own module in order to
reuse it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691900
