The _redisplay() function is usally used for subclasses of BaseAppView
which want to implement their own _redisplay() function, having that
function name in two classes which have nothing to do with BaseAppView
can be quite confusing. Make those names less confusing and call the
functions _sync() and _rebuildMenu() instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1011
The viewBox has a border applied, so when we call adaptToSize using only
the content box of the container, the width of the border is not removed
from the content box and the grid will be allocated less space than what
we told it before using adaptToSize.
Fix that by adjusting the content box for the size of the viewBox, too.
This makes sure the correct amount of columns can be shown inside a
folder, since right now we only show 3 colums even though 4 would fit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1011
Since 38da479ee we correctly ceil the non-integer radius of the slider
handle when calculating the offset for drawing the circle. Since the
handle also has a border with a width of 1px by default, we should also
factor that in when calculating the offset.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1569
Along the lines of `styleSheetName`, a session mode may want to provide its
own gresource file, so make this possible via a `themeResourceName` session
mode parameter, defaulted to gnome-shell-theme.gresource
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1063
Unlike any other methods in the Extensions API, LaunchExtensionPrefs()
opens what appears to be an application dialog, except that it is
really a separate application that the caller has no control over.
In order to address that, add a new OpenExtensionPrefs() method that
takes additional parameters (modelled after the desktop portal APIs)
that will make it possible to improve the behavior in the future.
The new parameters are ignored for now, but pushing the API out now
will allow us to fill in the functionality post the .0 release.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1074
The 'disable-user-extensions' GSettings key is the last extensions-related
setting that isn't exposed over D-Bus, and therefore requires consumers
to access the GSettings directly.
Expose the setting as UserExtensionsEnabled readwrite property in the
org.gnome.Shell.Extensions interface to allow consumers to manage
extensions purely via D-Bus.
The 'disable-user-extensions' setting is the last extension-related
bit from the org.gnome.shell GSettings schema that is not exposed
via D-Bus.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1074
This (mistakenly) now only depends on signals triggered on Wayland
sessions. Hardcoding the XIM support on X11 sessions will make input
in some clients work again.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1690
Currently, a failure to start the Systemd unit `gsd-xsettings.target`
would be considered a failure to start Xwayland.
That means that if `gsd-xsettings.target` fails to start for whatever
reason, no X11 client can be used on Wayland.
However, XSettings is by no mean mandatory for X11 clients and many
legacy X11 clients do not implement XSettings. Those who do always have
a fallback path and therefore can still work without XSettings.
Make a failure to start the Systemd unit `gsd-xsettings.target` non
blocking for Xwayland, and just log a warning message.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1065
We ended up always showing the switch-user button on the lock screen,
as showing and hiding it with the prompt was too visually distracting.
But now that we have a fancy transition in place, we can easily extend
it to the switch-user button as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1029
We only call _updateSensitivity() to make elements sensitive, and
nothing ever touches the sensitivity of the switch-user button; so
just call the corresponding authPrompt method directly, which is the
only bit that has an actual effect.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1029
We do spawn gsd-xsettings, and watch its name before notifying on the
given task, so the mutter bits can proceed with X11 startup.
One notable change is that we only start gsd-xsettings, instead of the
generic gnome-session-x11-services target. We do so as we have to wait
on a dbus name to appear in order to deem the initialization done, and
making it all depend on gsd-xsettings seems tidier.
Less notably, we also use ::shutdown-xserver to shutdown the related
services. Its major benefit is that it'd allow us to ensure the olderly
shutdown of those services, but it's unused at the moment.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/836
When a window is being resized by the compositor, with Wayland the
compositor first asks the window to change its size and emits the
"size-change" signal, and then emits the "size-changed" signal after
the window acknowledges the new size. To show a fancy resize animation,
gnome-shell creates a "screenshot" of the resizing window on the
"size-change" signal, and later animates that "screenshot" to the new
window size on the "size-changed" signal.
Now if a client is not responding to our requests asking it to change
its size, we get a "size-change" signal and start showing the
window-clone, but never a "size-changed" signal, animating and hiding
the clone again. This causes a so called "ghost window" that is shown
above everything else and never disappears again.
To fix that, start showing the window clone once we get the
"size-changed" signal instead of the "size-change" signal. This makes
sure the window actually updates its size and the clone is going to be
hidden again.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/1078https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1055
Creating a new GTimeZone for the local timezone can be quite expensive if
done repeatedly. It requires an open(), mmap(), and parsing of
/etc/localtime.
This patch was provided by Florian, and I've tested it as far back as
3.28.4 to ensure that we are really reducing the number of open() calls
on the compositor thread.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1051
Signed-off-by: Christian Hergert <chergert@redhat.com>
The thumbnails actor `this._thumbnails` has already been destroyed when
calling `_destroyThumbnails()` from the `destroy` signal handler because
it is a child actor of the AppSwitcherPopup. So stop destroying the
thumbnails separately (fading them out inside a destroy handler wouldn't
make sense anyway).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
The correct property for the scroll-direction with scrolling events is
`direction`, no `scroll_direction`. This fixes scrolling in the alt-tab
popup, which broke with the actorization changes.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
When the switcherPopup was initiated successfully, we return true,
otherwise the WindowManager will try to destroy it. Since an early
release of the keystroke will also switch to another application and
close the switcher just fine, we should return true to indicate success
here.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Right now the index that gets selected on click and motion events is set
when connecting the event inside the addItem function. If items are
added or removed (for example when an application is closed by pressing
"q"), this index isn't valid anymore and has to be updated.
To fix this, use the items themselves instead of the index as arguments
for the event handlers and lookup the index of the item inside the event
handler.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Set the accessible states of the switcherList items by calling a
function instead of manipulating class-internal variables from outside
the class, which is considered bad practice.
The check whether the item at `_selectedIndex` exists can also be
removed since we always select a new index after an item was removed
(i.e. an app was closed) and destroy the alt-tab switcher right away if
no more items exist (see `SwitcherPopup._itemRemovedHandler`).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Limit the minimum and maximum value to scroll to inside the box to 0 and
the upper limit, for some reason this was done right in _scrollToRight,
but not in _scrollToLeft.
This fixes the behavior of scrolling to the left: Before, scrolling one
item to the left moved the view to the first element of the list (this
can make the selected element invisible in large lists). Instead, scroll
one item to the left, just like scrolling to the right works.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Make sure the index that's being scrolled to doesn't change while the
scrolling animation is running by using an argument instead of the
this._highlighed class scope variable.
This fixes wrongly shown arrows when selecting new elements faster than
the scrolling animation takes for one index. The check run to disable
the arrow might be checking against a newer index than the one at the
start of the animation which results in the arrow not getting hidden
even if no more scrolling is possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Since this._highlighted is always set to the currently highlighted
index, there's no need to save the index to a separate variable. This
obviously depends on getting the new item highlighted as a result of the
item-entered event.
This fixes bugs in situations where the highlighted element changes
after an event that is not calling _onItemEnter, for example after
scrolling or pressing a key. In those cases the _currentItemEntered
variable wouldn't be updated and the old item couldn't be entered
anymore without entering another one before.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Visually the button is just an interactive label, so having the
interactive area extend to the empty space next to the label
is surprising.
Instead, left-align the whole button rather than just the label
inside, so the clickable area corresponds to the visible one.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1046
The 'gdm' user is not going to run a media player, so there is no
point in allowing the corresponding section on the login screen.
All other sections are already disabled, so this is the only reason why
we end up with the message list instead of only showing the calendar.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2241
This reverts commit c0c027c608. Because for
some reason animating external opacity and position is still incurring
internal repaints, which disables offscreening and makes fading of
overlapping actors look wrong. `ON_IDLE` should be fixed in mutter before
it is used (in boxpointer at least) again.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2270
If the sessionMode does not allow to show the overview, we should also
hide an already visible overview.
This fixes a bug where, if the lockscreen was shown while the overview
was visible, the Ctrl+Alt+Tab popup would allow navigating inside the
overview because the overview actor is still mapped.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1043
If a transition is reversed, the final property values will be the
same as before the transition. However this currently only works
correctly when we actually use a transition; to fix this with a
duration of 0, simply skip the set() call when the transition is
reversed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1042
While the unread messages indicator is updated when starting a new
session because we call _onSourceAdded() on existing sources, we should
also update the do-not-disturb setting which might still be enabled.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1037
We turned both the auth prompt's cancel button and the switch user
button into icon buttons now, which means they are completely cryptic
when using a screen reader.
Just use the previously used labels as accessible names, which has the
nice side effect of lowering the impact of the string freeze break.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
The button is hidden on the lock screen, so it shouldn't be allowed to
activate it, be it via click or keyboard. The latter is still possible
by keynaving to the button and hitting space/enter. Fix that by making
the button unfocusable when we make it unreactive.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
Since commit mutter/a2a8f0cda we force the focus surface of the
meta-wayland-pointer to NULL while the pointer is hidden. This
introduced an issue with the magnifier, where we use
`set_pointer_visible` to hide the real cursor and show our own cursor at
the correct position: Because the meta-wayland-pointer is still used to
communicate with Wayland clients, the UI of the windows will not respond
to mouse movement anymore as soon as the real cursor is hidden.
To fix this, use the newly added clutter_seat_inhibit_unfocus() API to
temporarily disable unsetting the focus-surface while the magnifier is
hiding the system cursor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/993
If we are transitioning the label from 0 to its natural height, we
must set natural-height-set again after querying the preferred height,
otherwise Clutter would skip the transition.
However when transitioning in the opposite direction, setting the
property to true can go horribly wrong:
If the actor hasn't been allocated before, it will store a fixed
natural height of 0. But as there is no fixed min-height, we can
end up with min-height > natural-height, which is a fatal error.
(This isn't an issue when *actually* setting a fixed height, as
that will set both natural and minimum height)
So instead of always setting natural-height-set to true, restore
its previous value to fix the issue.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2255
repeatCount and autoReverse don't play well with animations disabled:
They cause password entries to wiggle themselves off-screen (by ending
up with some off-scale translation-x value).
While we should handle this more gracefully in the transition helpers,
it also makes sense to handle the case directly in wiggle(): As it
uses a chain of three transitions, we would still end up with a crude
one-frame-per-transition wiggle "animation".
Instead, do no animation at all as you would expect when animations are
disabled.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2236
Now that we apply a strong blur effect to the background, it doesn't
make too much sense to use a separate lock-screen background: It will
be mostly unrecognizable anyway.
The alternative would be to turn off the blur effect if a different
background is used (or have a hidden setting for that), but that would
then imply that we must keep the contents readable without blur.
Let's avoid that rabbit hole and just re-use the regular background.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1001
To bypass offscreening in cases where continuous animation is happening.
Offscreening is slower in such cases so this reduces the render time of
animations within offscreenable actors.
On an i7-7700 this reduces the render time of boxpointers for example by
25-30%.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1025
`-slider-handle-radius` is a floating point value and even in the default
theme it's not a whole number. Regardless of the fractional part that's
still going to occupy a whole extra pixel with antialiasing. So make room
for it. Otherwise it looks clipped, which it is by the Cairo context of
its `StDrawingArea`.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1569
Unused at the moment, but add the plumbing so that default key
definitions may specify symbolic icons that will be shown instead
of the text.
This is intended to replace the use of CSS and background-image
to handle those buttons with an icon.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2214
While the gsetting is available for all who needs it, the Shell might
override it given various hueristics. Expose the decision made by the
Shell via a new property.
Intended to be used by gsd-xsettings as well as xdg-desktop-portal-gtk.
This also add a version property to the API, so that semi external
services (xdg-desktop-portal-gtk) can detect what API is expected to be
present.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/757
For reasons not yet fully understood, `Main.uiGroup.add_actor` takes around
10 milliseconds to complete.
Because of this, each `actor.opacity = 0` has a good chance of falling
on a different frame. And when it does, `_opacityChangedId` also lands
on multiple different frames each incurring a separate relayout cycle.
It is this excessive number of relayouts that causes stuttering in the
icon grid animation (#2065). But it is the slowness of `uiGroup.add_actor`
that causes the number to be excessive when it should be one.
By creating the clones and adding them to `uiGroup` early, we then enable
the existing loop starting the animation to complete within a single frame.
And by completing within a single frame all the opacity changes land within
the same frame interval, thus incurring only a single relayout instead of
many.
This issue went unnoticed until 004a5e1042 (!704), after which the slow
emissions of `notify::opacity` became a more visible performance problem.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2065https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1002
Now that the bind constraint changes the preferred size of
the actor, a major flaw in the AppDisplay code was exposed:
the folder dialog depends on the preferred size of a parent,
and the parent depends on the preferred size of the folder
dialog.
While we know this is not actually true, we shouldn't rely
on broken behavior to achieve this result. What's interesting
is that the bind constraint used by the folder dialog is a
relic of the development phase; we now control the position
and size of the dialog with a combination of CSS, and alignment.
Remove the unnecessary bind constraint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1027
Since the design of the notification popup changed with the theme
refactor and there are now boxes around the world-clock and weather
sections, the overlay scrollbar that is shown above them looks rather
bad. So simply hide that scrollbar, we still have the vfade effect to
indicate the container is scrollable and we also depend on that in the
new popup app-folders.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1013
Make sure the stylesheet properties of the window-chrome title are
updated before requesting the preferred width of the title to prevent
size changes of the title after we animated the width.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/58
Remove the default icon size of -1 and always set the container StBin to
a real size. This fixes an error where the "width" and "height"
properties get set to -2 (which is -1 * scaleFactor) in the `_init`
function.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1018
To make sure the GC really disposes the KeyboardController object we
need to remove all references to the object, which means we have to
disconnect signals the object connects to, too.
This also fixes a bug where keys remain pressed forever and thus also
break that key on real keyboards. It happens if the OSK gets destroyed
during an OSK-key is being held so the StButton of the key is not
released. That means the key remains pressed in the
MetaVirtualInputDevice that we are now leaking because
KeyboardController isn't garbage collected.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1015
xgettext gained some support for template strings, and no longer
fails when encountering '/' somewhere between backticks.
Unfortunately its support is still buggy as hell, and it is now
silently dropping translatable strings, yay. I hate making the
code worse, but until xgettext really gets its shit together,
the only viable way forward seems to be to not use template
strings in any files listed in POTFILES.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1014
Since quite a few strings of dialogs provided by external programs are
not updated yet and the string freeze is already in effect, make sure we
don't break those dialogs by stripping aways large parts of the
headline.
To do that, detect if the title label is larger than the available width
and if it is, switch to a smaller font-size of 13pt. This makes sure we
still show about the same number of characters in the headline as we did
in previous releases.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1012
With the old screen shield, we were simply hiding the lightboxes to show
the shield when the user became active after activating the shield but
before locking the screen (that is, when using a lock-delay).
However now that the shield is gone, we end up showing the unlock dialog
even though we are not actually locked.
We probably don't want to add back a shield-like mode (that is, a way to
raise the unlock dialog without authentication when we aren't locked),
so just deactivate the whole shield when the user becomes active again
before the lock kicks in.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2213
The design team discussed the ellipses at the end of the hint text of
our entries and, even though they are present in most mockups, it turned
out they don't like them, so remove them.
It also turned out they don't like the prefixes like "Enter" before it,
so remove those, too.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/977
With the new dialog design the descriptions of entries are now
implemented as hint-text of the StEntry. That means the colon at the end
of the descriptions no longer makes sense and should be removed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/977
Currently separators get all the padding from regular menu items,
which is excessive for non-interactive elements.
Shuffle style classes around a bit to allow overriding the normal
padding for separators.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1004
Shift, caps-lock and friends change the capitalization of following
key presses. It is unexpected for those keys to have side-effects,
so don't switch to the prompt when they are pressed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
We don't want to show a caps-lock warning when showing a non-password
entry, but we also don't want the layout to jump when changing the
label's visibility.
Achieve that by inserting an empty placeholder label that we can
show whenever the caps-lock warning is hidden.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
The promptBox is initially fully opaque, so showing it before the
transition can result in a brief flash before fading in.
Just remove the show() call and let the transition handle the
visibility.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2212
Usually, logging in or unlocking the session is made asynchronously,
and AuthPrompt properly manages which entry is currently visible.
External code don't rely on any specific entry to be set, since it
is AuthPrompt's responsibility to select the correct one to be shown.
However, there's one specific case where AuthPrompt must preserve
the password entry: on reset. The reset code preserved whatever
entry was currently displayed, but after fe69dacaf1, it always
changes to the username entry.
Make sure to show the password entry on reset.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
In the past, the session menu button was part of the auth prompt widgetry,
so we didn't have to manually hide it when showing the user list. However,
now it is part of the login screen itself.
Hide the session menu button when the user list is shown.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
In the common case where we only have a single unread notification
from a particular app, the count doesn't add useful information.
Reduce clutter a bit by only showing the notification count if we
have at least two.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/997
Clicking or typing to reveal the auth prompt are good options for
mouse/keyboard workflows, but awkward on touch devices. Now that
we have SwipeTracker, adding corresponding gestures support is
easy, so do just that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
The current transition between clock and auth prompt uses a simple
crossfade.
"What kind of spatial model is that?!"
T.B.
Root the transition a bit more by adding translation and scale to
the animation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
Hiding the Caps lock warning label changes the layout of
Auth Prompt. This is specially noticeable when logging in
with unlisted users, where we change the visibility of this
label after typing a username, and the whole user widget
moves a bit.
Change the Cap lock label's opacity instead of hiding it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, when a null user is passed, we don't add any
username label. That makes the layout of user and no-user
cases inconsistent.
Add a ghost label with no opacity to mimic the username
label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, AuthPrompt is connecting to its own 'next' signal
signal to react to any of the entries being activated, and do
some actions like starting the spinner and answering the PAM
question.
Refactor this code into another method, and don't connect to
our own signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Unfortunately, the question that is displayed comes directly
from PAM. It usually is just "Password:", which comes from
pam-unix, but other questions can be set, usually with the
colons, since they are crafted with a CLI workflow in mind.
Manually drop the colons from questions asked by PAM. This
is also done by the PolKit agent, which shows how the stack
is fragile, but it's what we have for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
This is a regression from the transition to password entry. Both
entries need to be connected to the relevant signals, otherwise
username-based login won't ever work.
Connect both the text and the password entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, there is a dedicated label above the entry to
display the question text. According to the new mockups
for the lock screen, this label doesn't exist; instead,
the question is set inside the entry itself, as a hint
text.
Set the questions as hint texts of the entry, and remove
the now unused label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
If username-based login flow is followed, we need a default avatar
for the userWidget. Hence, check if the user passed to userWidget
is (null) which implies a username-based login flow.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Allow vertical orientation for the userWidget so that the user-avatar
can be centered and user's name can be placed below it. The plan
for 3.36 is to use this vertical userWidget layout for both lock
and login screen.
The userWidget is also used while creating the user-selection list
at the login, hence we still need to keep the horizontal layout
for userWidget in place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Since the blur sigma decides how many pixels get factored in when
blurring and setting a scale factor increases the background texture by
that factor, the sigma value should also be multiplied by the scale
factor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/991
There is nothing else to be focused in the lock screen itself -- the
top bar is already handled elsewhere, and the dialog manages itself
now.
Remove the lock screen group from the Ctrl-Alt-Tab manager.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
AuthPrompt is the set of actors that contain the user avatar,
the username, and the password entry. With the removal of the
screen shield, the unlock dialog (be it UnlockDialog or the
LoginDialog) is always created, and in the case of UnlockDialog,
so is the auth prompt.
This is problematic, though, since for passwordless accounts,
the simple act of creating AuthPrompt authenticates the user,
and lifts the lock screen.
Create the AuthPrompt on demand in UnlockDialog.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
As per the latest lock screen mockups, critical notifications must have
a more prominent, solid color.
Add a .critical style class to critical notification bubbles, and make
them darker.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Now that the screen shield is gone (at least, as it used to
be), the corresponding session mode is not necessary anymore
as well.
Remove the 'lock-screen' session mode, and the corresponding
CSS.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Pretty much what the commit title says.
This gives the lock shield actor another role: instead of
being the interactive screen shield, make it the invisible
actor that prevents interacting with windows while the
unlock dialog is sliding down.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Activating a dialog is slightly different from opening it; the
former is about showing the user authentication widgetry, while
the latter is about creating it and pre-allocating the necessary
resources.
Activate the screen shield dialog when necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
The 'onPrimary' argument was being passed to dialog.open(). Turns out,
neither UnlockDialog nor LoginDialog use this parameter.
Remove the unnecessary 'onPrimary' parameter, and cleanup the related
code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
The use of the core idle monitor means that focus change events
are also delayed by keyboard interaction. Since the magnifier is
already in the business of pointer tracking, it's easy enough to
fire the pointer rest timeout from here, so focus changes are
accumulated and delayed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
We may get several a11y events setting the caret on the same
coordinates it previously was. Make focus tracking ignore those,
as we're jumping to the same coordinates again during eg. mouse
operation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
If the crosshair is clipped so it doesn't cover the pointer cursor,
the clip rectangle is skewed towards the bottom/right. This was
made so to accomodate the default pointer, but the unevenness stays
on other pointer cursors, and it makes the crosshair look odd on
short crosshair length.
Make all lines clip to an even distance from the center instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
It is somewhat unexpected that crosshair color and pointer cursor colors
remain the same across changes in color inversion settings, and may lead
to contrast issues. Apply the effect on the common container, so it
applies to these all.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
If the icon proper has opacity of zero then that's probably because a
clone of it is animating. So avoid animating the source actor too.
And if there's any other reason for the opacity being zero, still don't
animate it because we can't see it :)
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2167
So as to guarantee the unmapped state sticks and doesn't get toggled
back to mapped before we return.
Being in a mapped state when `FolderIcon.vfunc_unmap()` returned was
causing an assertion failure in `clutter_actor_set_mapped` and crashed
the shell.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2170
The portal helper is rather sensitive because potentially-hostile Wi-Fi
networks can decide to launch it whenever they want (by blocking the
user's connection to the nmcheck domain) and load whatever web content
they want into it. So having this unsandboxed is really extraordinarily
risky. Previously it was a risk we had to accept, because WebKit did not
have a web process sandbox, but now it does. So let's bubblewrap all the
things!
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/983
Commit 147a743d8d moved the suspend and power-off actions into
the submenu that contains the log-out and switch-user actions,
but did not update the submenu visibility logic to account for
the additional actions.
As a result, the submenu is hidden when log-out and switch-user
are unavailable (like on the login screen), even if suspend and
power-off are enabled.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2169
While gnome-shell will now check for extension updates, the checks
are performed infrequently. Opening the Extensions app implies that
the user's current focus is on extensions, so it is an appropriate
time to schedule another updates check.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Now that we can download, apply and display extension updates, it is time
to actually check for updates. Schedule an update check right on startup,
then every 24 hours.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Now that we have support for extension updates in the shell, we
need some place to display the updates to the user.
As we are establishing the Extensions app as the primary way for
managing extensions, it's a natural place for that functionality.
Show which extensions have updates available, and offer a log out
button (so gnome-shell can apply the updates when logging back in).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Until now, it didn't matter whether an extension was installed in the
user's home or system-wide. However with support for uninstallation,
there is now a significant different, as that action is only available
for user extensions.
Account for that by separating extensions by type, so that users don't
have to second-guess which extensions can be fully-managed and which
appear as part of the system.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The newly added expander gives us a place where we can display
more details without cluttering the interface.
Take advantage of that by including the extension website, version
and author.
(Author is in the mockups, but will not actually be shown until
the extensions website is changed to include it in its metadata;
however best to have UI and string in place for the freezes)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The description can be useful information, but also increases the
visual complexity of the extensions list. Move it into a hidden
details area that can be expanded, which unclutters the interface
while keeping the information readily available.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The current fixed two-line label requires a custom widget, which
make moving to a widget template harder.
As the description will soon move elsewhere anyway, just go back
to a single line with a standard label for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Extensions can have a major impact on stability and performance. Now that
the tool will become the main way for users to manage their extensions, it
is an appropriate place to warn the user of that risk.
Add a small info popover to the headerbar to display that warning, together
with the previously removed hint of where to go for finding new extensions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Currently when the extensions list is scrolled, it is possible to
keynav out of view, as the scrolling doesn't follow the key focus.
Hook up the adjustment to fix that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Currently the main window is a plain Gtk.ApplicationWindow that is
built and managed from within the application.
As the application becomes more complex, it makes sense to decouple
the two and handle the window from a separate ExtensionsWindow class.
Not least this is a prerequisite of using a widget template for the
window.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
GNOME Software will remove its extension support, so we should stop
referencing it in addition to extensions.gnome.org.
In fact, the placeholder is not the best place to hint at where new
extensions can be found, as the user will never see it in case the
distribution includes pre-installed extensions.
So remove the hint altogether, we will add it back in a more prominent
place later.
With the whole placeholder now being much lighter, we can stop dimming
the remaining elements.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
If all password entries in dialogs are hidden, there is either an entry
that has visible characters or no entry at all. That means we don't have
to show the caps lock warning at all, so hide it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/942
