The focused window will move up/down together with the OSK if the focus
area happens to be covered by the area to be covered by the OSK. This
state is reverted whenever the window loses focus, given it wasn't
relayout in between.
IBus was initially made optional as gnome-shell depended on too
recent API. This API is now old enough and gnome-shell is committing
further to IBus by implementing a ClutterInputMethod through it.
Let's just make IBus a mandatory dependency, instead of making code
paths trickier to cater for situations where it's missing.
We do not need the parent Keyboard object to handle those specially, the
code can be self-contained enough. The Key object will simply emit
pressed/released events containing the keycode/string, be it from the
parent key or one contained in the BoxPointer.
StIMText used to handle key events for IM consumption in the capture phase,
this made the search box work automagically with nothing explicitly focusing
it. Since it's no longer the case, it has to be done somewhere.
Instead of manually resizing each key everytime the keyboard needs to
relayout, have a special grid container that will preserve aspect when
resized.
This actor works in two stages though, first the keys need to be added
and then layoutButtons() need to be called for the actors to be
reparented to the container with the right attachment options.
This is a ClutterInputMethod implementation using IBus underneath. The
input method will interact with the currently focused ClutterInputFocus,
be it shell chrome or wayland clients through the text_input protocol.
The keys possibly need resizing after a (new) layer has been set, there's
however calling places that don't. Instead, fold this._redraw() into
setActiveLayer().
The st_button_release() call wouldn't happen because StButton does not
set priv->button_mask on touch events. And if we make it called, we can't
try to unset the device grab at the end of the function, as device/sequence
are unset earlier on.
Getting the necessary "setting enabled, or input from touchscreen"
conditions to have the OSK shown are not enough on the lack of a
current focus. As we are setting up the caret tracker here, wait for
the focus in event before showing the keyboard.
This fixes 2 issues, with the setting disabled it became really hard
to get the OSK hidden on eg. touchscreen->pointer device switches,
as visibility only depended on the a11y setting here. And secondly,
enabling the setting would always end up with the OSK being shown
regardless of focus, while it should stay hidden if there's no text
edition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788188
If the underlying X11 input driver creates multiple devices from a single
device node, we may end up picking up the wrong device. So, instead of
picking the first device based on node and bailing out if it's not a pad,
pick the first pad that has that device node, and bail out if there is
none.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/10Closes: #10
gvc has made some recent changes that rename its user options
following meson guidelines for GNOME packages[0].
The options used in gvc as a subproject have been renamed
accordingly.
[0] https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/MesonPorting
It turns out that NetworkManager does export the directory as pkg-config
variable after all, so use that instead of building the path ourselves
from the prefix.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789811
We want touch events to enable the keyboard and focus tracking, but
not to actually show it right away. Implement that behavior by only
changing the visibility of the keyboard when triggered by a GSettings
change.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788188
We enable the keyboard when it is either enabled explicitly via
a11y settings or when using a touch device. We'll soon want to
special-case changes to the GSettings, so track its value in a
dedicated property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788188
When the agent doesn't work (e.g. when the screen is locked), it shouldn't be
registered with NM. Otherwise it will keep cancelling the requests that
could happily be serviced with system secrets.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789811
The native agent already forgets about the request at the point it's
serviced and the further attempt to use it (e.g. cancel it when the screen
is locked) will trigger an assertion failure:
** (gnome-shell:30862): CRITICAL **: shell_network_agent_respond: assertion 'request != NULL' failed
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789811