We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
Some more places where the indentation doesn't comply with either
the old or new style. They slipped through because the legacy eslint
configuration accounts for some patterns by plainly ignoring certain
nodes. We'll address that later, first fix up the indentation errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
We currently use no less than three different ways of indenting
object literals:
let obj1 = {
foo: 42,
bar: 23,
};
let obj2 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23 };
let obj3 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23
};
The first is the one we want to use everywhere eventually, while the
second is the most commonly used "legacy" style.
It is the third one that is most problematic, as it throws off eslint
fairly badly: It violates both the rule to have consistent line breaks
in braces as well as the indentation style of both regular and legacy
configurations.
Fortunately the third style was mostly used for tween parameters, so
is quite rare after the Tweener purge. Get rid of the remaining ones
to cut down on pre-existing eslint errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
While we aren't using those destructured variables, they are still useful
to document the meaning of those elements. We don't want eslint to keep
warning about them though, so mark them accordingly.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
Those unused arguments aren't bugs - unbeknownst to eslint, they all
correspond to valid signal parameters - but they don't contribute
anything to clarity, so just remove them anyway.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent on whether case labels share the same
indentation level as the corresponding switch statement or not. gjs
goes with the default of no additional indentation, so go along with
that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent with whether or not to put a space
after catch clauses. While the predominant style is to omit it,
that's inconsistent with the style we use for any other statement.
There's not really a good reason to stick with it, so switch to
the style gjs/eslint default to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
While allowed by the syntax, they are problematic because the
variable is in the scope of the switch() statement, but only
valid if a particular case clause is reached.
Add braces to limit the variables' scope to the corresponding
case clause to avoid that problem.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
We can use that newer method where we don't care about the actual position
of an element inside the array.
(Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() do behave differently in edge cases,
for example in the handling of NaN, but those don't matter to us)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/152
Make the dialog a widget itself, removing the `_group` property used for
handling the actor.
Update all the inherited classes to be also GObject implementations, moving all
the signals to proper object ones.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/55
This extends the ShellMountPasswordDialog by widgets which allow
specifying parameters supported by TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt compatible
volumes (TCRYPT). This includes:
- Whether the volume to be unlocked is hidden.
- Whether the volume to be unlocked is a system partition.
Note: TrueCrypt and VeraCrypt only support encrypting Windows
systems [1], so the label for this option is "Windows System Volume".
- Whether to use a PIM [2].
- Whether to use keyfiles. Unfortunately, GMountOperation doesn't
support TCRYPT keyfiles, so if this checkbox is checked, we tell the
user that they should unlock the volume with Disks, which supports
unlocking TCRYPT volumes with keyfiles.
[1] https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/System%20Encryption.html
[2] https://www.veracrypt.fr/en/Header%20Key%20Derivation.htmlhttps://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/126
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkPolicyType. It's bit-compatible with it, too.
All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
When connecting to a Wi-Fi router that supports the WPS button method
(PBC, push button connection) the user can simply press the button on
the router. Show an explanation in the PSK prompt when this is
possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/329
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
Otherwise the user object could outlive the dialogue, emit a subsequent
signal, and the callback from that signal could reference finalised
objects/widgets from the dialogue. The likely mechanism for the user
outliving the dialogue is caching of user objects within
libaccountsservice.
This can be triggered by running `pkexec true` from a gnome-terminal
window, then calling `pkill pkexec` from another terminal (on a
different VT or via SSH). This causes the dialogue to be cancelled by
polkitd.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/357
Rather than explicitly destroying the session after calling close(),
destroy it from the `closed` signal handler.
This also means we can make the method internal.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/357
In case there are any internal ways the dialogue can close itself
without calling its own close() method, it’s probably better to do all
our cleanup on a handler for the `closed` signal instead.
This should introduce no functional changes except ensuring the
polkitAgent cleanup is always done.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/357
Otherwise the session could outlive the dialogue, emit a subsequent
signal, and its callback would reference finalised objects/widgets from
the dialogue. The PolkitSession object is implemented by
libpolkit-gobject, so we have no guarantees about its reference counting
— the session object could keep itself alive in another thread, or be a
singleton. In all likelihood, the session hangs around for longer than
the dialogue due to differences in when the two objects are garbage
collected.
This can be triggered by running `pkexec true` from a gnome-terminal
window, then calling `pkill pkexec` from another terminal (on a
different VT or via SSH). This causes the dialogue to be cancelled by
polkitd.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/357
In contrast to generic animated icons, it is reasonable to expect
spinners to be invisible while inactive. Implement that behavior
in the new Spinner class and optionally animate the transitions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/316
If no password or a wrong password is entered after automounting an
encrypted device, then the password should be reasked. However, this
does not happen because the relevant udisks error messages for this
cases are missing in the exception handler that calls _reaskPassword.
Fix this issue by adding the relevant udisks error strings to the
exception handling in the _onVolumeMounted method.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/640
As a mount operation's UI may be reused (for example after mistyping
the password), we only close the operation once the mount has finished
(successfully or with error).
We therefore need to track ongoing operations, which we currently do
by monkey-patching the corresponding volume object. However while the
underlying GVolume object indeed remains the same through-out the
operation, the JS wrapper object isn't referenced anywhere and may
thus be garbage collected, resulting in a stuck dialog.
Fix this issue by tracking active operations explicitly, so that all
involved objects are referenced until the end of the operation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/565
The `hints` and `settingName` parameters to the agent call may define
the specific list of secrets NM actually needs from the user. This
seems to have been the intended use of these two parameters but only
recently did NM with the IWD backend start to use this to request 802.1x
secrets. So if `hints` is provided, ask user for the specific secrets
listed there and don't even look at what type of EAP method is in use.
Only the three types of secrets actually in use by NM's IWD backend are
supported for now -- they happen to be the same three that
_get8021xSecrets() had already supported.
