Now that the calendar message list and the message sections are actors, there's
no need to keep track of the sections in a different Map as we can just use the
native clutter functions to manage the children and access to their properties.
Also cleanup the signal connection/disconnection.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
When messages are added to the message list, we create a container for those,
however since now the messages are actor themselves we can just create a list
item actor that holds the message actor and refer to the message parent in order
to get their container.
This allows to remove the obj container map we used, using the native clutter
parent-child hierarchy and handle signal connections cleanly.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
Those unused arguments aren't bugs - unbeknownst to eslint, they all
correspond to valid signal parameters - but they don't contribute
anything to clarity, so just remove them anyway.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent with whether or not to put a space
after catch clauses. While the predominant style is to omit it,
that's inconsistent with the style we use for any other statement.
There's not really a good reason to stick with it, so switch to
the style gjs/eslint default to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
We can use that newer method where we don't care about the actual position
of an element inside the array.
(Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() do behave differently in edge cases,
for example in the handling of NaN, but those don't matter to us)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/152
Here's a template string with '/' that escaped commit 94423151b2,
resulting in an xgettext warning when generating the .pot file.
Simply move it into the resource like the other interface descriptions
to make xgettext happy again.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/407
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkPolicyType. It's bit-compatible with it, too.
All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
The built-in calendar isn't meant to replace a full-fledged calendar
app, which is why clearing event messages only hides the event in
gnome-shell rather than deleting the actual event. This has turned out
to not be overly useful and often confusing - it creates a discrepancy
with visible events in apps, isn't revertible in a non-obscure fashion
and non-obviously limited to the current date.
As we are considering moving events out of the message list and back to
the calendar, it looks like a good time to remove that ability and keep
notifications as the only removable messages.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/262
Since commit 5fb8d4f730, a NotificationMessage's notification property
is reset to null when the notification is destroyed. However at that
point we still have connected signal handlers around that we'll try
to disconnect later.
Avoid the warnings by disconnecting and resetting the handler IDs at
the same time as the notification.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/308
We have a callback that will call close() when the notification is
destroyed, and a callback that will call destroy() on the notification
when the message is closed.
Currently, if the notification is destroyed we'll execute our callback
that will call again destroy() on the notification. That's bad
practice in general, and it also has the side effect of resetting the
destroy reason.
This commit avoids re-destroying the notification by dropping the
notification reference on destroy.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/258
Destroying and recreating the entire events list on every change is not only
wasteful, it also breaks the clear functionality as messages scheduled for
removal are replaced with "new" messages after the first message has been
removed.
Address both issues by keeping track of all messages and re-use them
whenever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/325
When not using arrow notation with anonymous functions, we use Lang.bind()
to bind `this` to named callbacks. However since ES5, this functionality
is already provided by Function.prototype.bind() - in fact, Lang.bind()
itself uses it when no extra arguments are specified. Just use the built-in
function directly where possible, and use arrow notation in the few places
where we pass additional arguments.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23
glibc 2.27 introduced new format specifiers for the month names.
It's obligatory to use them in several languages already and it's
encouraged to use them for all languages because it is not destructive
for any language. As more languages are expected to follow this
standard it's better to use the "%OB" format specifier now so it will
start working correctly automatically.
See also: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10871
This standard has been also working in BSD and OS X since 1990s,
if anyone tries to use gnome-shell in these systems.
Note: This will not work correctly with glibc < 2.27, there is no
detection whether the system is old or new.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780957
As notification icons now align with the title, it makes sense for
them to follow the text size in case a text-scaling-factor other
than 1 is applied.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=788265
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
Commit 39a840e2c3 added an additional parameter to shell_app_launch().
When adjusting callers, the parameter was also added accidentally to
calls of the confusingly similar g_app_info_launch() ...
Remove those to fix some warnings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781471
Without the boxy background, event messages look a bit plain and
unaligned with other messages. Adding an icon addresses this,
however as repeating the same icon over and over again in case of
many events would be rather noisy, only show it for the top event
as in the mockups.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775763
Update the notification style according to the latest mockups:
- make notification icons smaller and prefer symbolic variants
- remove background box when not hovered/focused
- increase spacing between elements
- use normal text sizes
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775763
For notifications in the message list, it is usually less relevant
when exactly it occurred, but how long ago. So rather than showing
the exact time and expecting the user to figuring out the timespan
themselves, change the format to something human readable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=775763
