While the unlock dialog is created early so that it appears below
the shield while the curtain slides up, it is destroyed immediately
when the shield slides back in.
Keep it around until the shield is down instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684342
When locking the screen, the user menu is moved to the opposite
side. Unless we close the menu immediately without animation, the
menu will jump to the other side and fade out while the screen
shield slides down.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684343
Instead of leaving the login or unlock dialogs in an inconsistent state,
catch DBus errors and show an Authentication Error message. The error
details are logged in the session logs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060
Due to the way the IBus API works we might get property changes while
the menu is already open. In that case the separator visibility logic
doesn't work since it only applies on menu open/close. This works
around that issue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682314
IBus has a properties API which are basically generic knobs into the
engine which are serialized and presented in a way that allows us to
easily build actionable UI elements with them.
Instead of implementing the whole generic system and accepting
everything coming out of the engines, for now, this patch just adds
support for a couple of important IBus Anthy properties.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682314
The screenshield requires gdm 3.5, which can be problematic in
jhbuild configurations, or distributions that don't use GDM as the display
manager. Allow transparent fallback to gnome-screensaver in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060
When the tray is triggered by keybinding rather than dwelling, the
first summary item should be given key focus. Currently this is
achieved by grabbing the focus before toggling the tray, so that
the grabHelper will move the focus for us. However this interferes
with the grabHelper's focus save/restore mechanism - for instance,
after using the keybinding once, the tray will always come up with
the first item focused.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently it is only possible to use keynav inside the tray if it
has been triggered with the keyboard shortcut. Make it possible to
initiate keynav by hitting Tab in other cases as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently opening the summary boxpointer acts as a stop gap for
keynav - the only shortcut still working is "Escape" to hide the
tray altogether.
Change the handling of Escape to only close the summary boxpointer
and allow to use the down arrow as alternative (unless the boxpointer
already processes the key press itself of course, like the chat
entry does). Also add a Delete shortcut to dismiss the open summary
item.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently clicks outside the grabbed actors are handled the same as
the user pressing Escape - a single actor is popped from the grab stack.
However according to the design, outside clicks should release all grabs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
When using keynav in the top bar, menus may be opened using the
down arrow; in a similar fashion, allow to open the summary
boxpointer with the up arrow.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
'destroy' is emitted before the actor is unmapped during destruction, so
notify::mapped would emit an exception. Since unmapping is guaranteed,
the 'destroy' signal is unnecessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684154
Remove the PlacesManager, its search provider and all associated code.
Places search is now provided by nautilus using the external search
provider API.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683506
When Dan Winship wrote the GrabHelper code originally, it didn't
handle a grab stack. I wrote the grab stack code hastily when landed
the message tray, not understanding all of the code that was involved
here.
Fix it so that we properly do the operations for each type of grab
when we first need to, and not sometimes when the first grab is taken.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683546
_hideTray() is called by _updateState() when the tray is visible
but should be hidden; however, _updateState() may be called again
from within _hideTray() when releasing the GrabHelper grab, so
unless we update the _trayState variable before that, _hideTray()
will be called a second time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
A couple of people have walked up to me and asked how to get to the
unlock screen from the screen shield. This was partly addressed by
bug 682285, but all three people who asked me about this said they
tried the return key and were surprised when it didn't work.
It sort of makes sense, since the user is "enter"ing the computer or
"return"ing to it.
This commit makes enter work in addition to the existing escape key.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683889
Since we now use the capture phase to feed events into the input
method, we must set the capture flag for the event that starts
searches so that IMs can get at it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684040
If the user starts typing right away, assume that the entry is
for a password and don't clear it when the secret request actually
comes. Then, if the user completes typing, we also stash the answer
and send it to GDM right away on the first PAM prompt.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681576
The onUngrab callback already checks if all notifications are destroyed and
hides immediately if so. Previous code instead would leave state handling
in an inconsistent state, by not removing the grab, not setting
summaryBoxPointerState to HIDDEN and not disconnecting various signals.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684036
Look at the focus window's interaction timestamp to catch the case
where the user is typing and knocks the pointer into the tray or
mouses down to the bottom of the screen and clicks on something.
If the focus window's interaction time differs at the start and
end of the tray dwell then we don't activate the tray.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683811
In gdm, we would attempt to become modal during the synchronous initialization,
and this would fail, as X prevents grabs on unmapped windows. Instead,
wait for the stage to be visible before becoming modal.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683357
As PAM messages are now shown below the password entry, there is no
need for this complexity, and we can just hide all notifications.
Also, this avoids the ambiguity between notification.showWhenLocked and
source.showInLockScreen, which have very different effects.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683369
The selector for insensitive popup menu items was wrong (a PopupMenuItem is
a ShellGenericContainer, not a StButton). Fixing it showed that previous
:insensitive tracking was manual for a reason: we have many items that are
not reactive, but don't want the insensitive styling (for example those in
the battery menu).
Fix it by adding a new style-class, popup-inactive-menu-item, that is added
to all new PopupMenuItems that are not activatable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683988
CLUTTER_CURRENT_TIME (like GDK_CURRENT_TIME and libX11 CurrentTime) is 0,
and thus compares lower than all valid timestamps, meaning that
focus changes without an X11 event in the stack are ignored by
the on screen keyboard.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664309
pending-messages-removed is emitted for sent messages too, but we don't
include those in the _pendingMessages list. Avoid useless spew in the session
logs in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683449
St.Theme.load_stylesheet() does not queue a theme context change, so
any styling of widgets created before will not be updated. To fix this,
load the stylesheet before the extension builds its own UI in enable()
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682128
This means that right-clicking on an entry shouldn't visibly change the theme,
which is unexpected. Make sure that closing the menu refocused the entry, too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683509
