Create StImageContent as a simple ClutterImage with preferred width/height
properties in order to be able to use explicit sizing when creating clutter
contents that will be applied to actors whose size depends on the content itself.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
Instead of just passing a scale when getting a cached icon, pass both a
'paint_scale', the scale of which the icon will be painted on the
stage, and a 'resource_scale', the scale of the resource used for
painting.
In effect, the texture size will use the scale 'paint_scale * resource_scale'
in a ceiled value while the size of the actor will use 'paint_scale' when
determining the size.
this would load a bigger texture, but the downscaling would keep the visual
quality.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
Create the surfaces for background shadows at scaled sizes and then draw on them
using logical coordinates, by setting the surface device scale accordingly.
Use the said surface scale when generating the actual shadow cairo pattern
but in such case, to reduce the number of code changes, is better to work in
absolute coordinates, and to do so:
1) Create a temporary shadow-spec copy with scaled values to absolute sizes
2) Invert the scaling on the shadow matrix
3) Do the actual painting in absolute coordinates
4) Set the shadow matrix scaling back to the logical coordinates.
Finally scale down the created shadow pattern surface size when painting it,
applying again a reverse scale to the matrix.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
Pass resource-scale to drawing phase, and use it to create texture
surfaces scaled with the widget current scaling.
Also redraw by default widgets when the resource scale changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
A fractional resource scale would mean we never use the fast path for
creating the shadow, because we'd cast the int to a float before
comparing, which would never match.
Instead compare the expected texture size with the source texture, to
actually potentially trigger the fast path.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
The fade shader will draw the fade effect up until the border pixel. If
we set the bottom right coordinate to the outer edge of the pixel we
might end up not drawing the fade effect on all of the pixels. This
could for example happen if one logical pixel (clutter stage pixel)
consists of more than one physical pixel.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
This commit makes StWidget manage the scale of which its associated
resources should be multiplied with. The resource scale is calculated
by clutter, and is retrieved by clutter_actor_get_resource_scale(). Due
to the resource scale not always being available, the getter may fail,
and the actual widget that draws the content will have to deal with
this situation.
As the resource scale depends on where on the stage the widget is drawn,
the resource scale will in general be available once the widget is
mapped.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
While we don't actually require a more recent version at build time,
we do need the latest stable version at runtime. There's no strong
reason for making that differentiation, so bump the requirement.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1006
instead of explicit screen arguments and `gdk_screen_get_number()`, as nowadays there
is always only one screen. This silences some deprecation warnings and removes
deprecated API.
Bonus: some code style cleanups
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/422
Running dnf to update and install additional packages every time
the job is executed slows down the CI pipeline. Avoid this by
using another custom images for JS source checks.
In addition to the js shell we use for the existing syntax check,
also include eslint for future jobs and some extension-specific
tooling to make the image more useful to extension authors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/408
So far we are only performing a basic syntax check on javascript
sources; it's time to test the C code as well. As mutter is tightly
coupled, we bite the bullet and build it as well, either using a
matching branch (if it exists), or current master.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/408
Ouch, this went unnoticed for a long time: As the minimum size of menu
items is generally small (because its label can be ellipsized), we are
requesting the unellipsized width of the last "size child" instead of
the widest one.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/996
This adds a pipeline stage for merge requests that checks that the
commit message contains an URL to either a issue or a merge request.
This means that for merge requests without corresponding issues will
always fail initially, as the merge request URL is not known until after
it is created. This is still arguably better than accidentally merging
merge requests without URLs.
Taken from https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/440.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/410
