gjs has gotten less forgiving about missing getters/setters, and
commit 6aa1b817 missed the missing getter in the base policy class.
Most notifications use a policy subclass that already provides a
getter, but at least Main.notify() and friends don't; unbreak them
by fixing the base class.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1229
These properties are never written; in the base class they are always
their default values, and in the subclasses the getters are overridden.
This will be necessary because GJS is adding checks to make sure that
readable properties always have a getter, writable properties always
have a setter, and that the variations of camelCase/snake_case are
handled correctly. It's supposedly backwards compatible, but that
assumes that code is not doing things like forgetting a setter on a
writable property. (If the missing setter had ever been called, it might
have led to a crash, which is why we've made this change.)
This is the minimally invasive patch which should work with both older
and newer versions of GJS. If you decide to require GJS 1.65.2, then
you'll also be able to remove the getters from NotificationPolicy as
well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1205
Destroying the policy invalidates it, so accessing it from a
Source::destroy handler (for example to disconnect signal
handlers) currently results in warnings like:
Object .Gjs_ui_messageTray_NotificationApplicationPolicy
(0x7f8c7c0a64a0), has been already deallocated — impossible
to access it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2238
xgettext gained some support for template strings, and no longer
fails when encountering '/' somewhere between backticks.
Unfortunately its support is still buggy as hell, and it is now
silently dropping translatable strings, yay. I hate making the
code worse, but until xgettext really gets its shit together,
the only viable way forward seems to be to not use template
strings in any files listed in POTFILES.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1014
Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
ES6 allows to omit property names where they match the name of the
assigned variable, which makes code less redunant and thus cleaner.
We will soon enforce that in our eslint rules, so make sure we use
the shorthand wherever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
Dispose the Source Object when dispose() is called, avoiding that it could be
called twice on a destroyed Source.
So, notify count changes before destroying the object, and don't emit this
twice on destroyNonResidentNotifications (as if a notification is destroyed
the property notify will happen in the notification destroy callback anyways).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
When the notification is destroyed we should also dispose the underneath GLib
object, and ensure that we don't dispose this twice.
In order to avoid this, don't destroy transient notifications that have been
already been removed and only destroy the resident notifications on activation
if they have not been destroyed earlier.
Thus connect after to the 'activated' signal and once the default handler has
been called destroy the notification if not requested earlier.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
We currently use no less than three different ways of indenting
object literals:
let obj1 = {
foo: 42,
bar: 23,
};
let obj2 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23 };
let obj3 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23
};
The first is the one we want to use everywhere eventually, while the
second is the most commonly used "legacy" style.
It is the third one that is most problematic, as it throws off eslint
fairly badly: It violates both the rule to have consistent line breaks
in braces as well as the indentation style of both regular and legacy
configurations.
Fortunately the third style was mostly used for tween parameters, so
is quite rare after the Tweener purge. Get rid of the remaining ones
to cut down on pre-existing eslint errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
We now have everything in place to replace Tweener for all animatable
properties with implicit animations, which has the following benefits:
- they run entirely in C, while Tweener requires context switches
to JS each frame
- they are more reliable, as Tweener only detects when an animation
is overwritten with another Tween, while Clutter considers any
property change
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/22
Notifications use a transition that overshoots the target value, however
we can only really do that for the position and not the opacity where
some values would end up out of the valid range.
We currently address this by proxying the actual opacity property in a
javascript property, and clamp it to the valid range in an onUpdate()
callback.
This won't be an option if we want to use Clutter animations, so instead,
use separate tweens for opacity and position.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/22
The different units - seconds for Tweener and milliseconds for
timeouts - are not a big issue currently, as there is little
overlap. However this will change when we start using Clutter's
own animation framework (which uses milliseconds as well), in
particular where constants are shared between modules.
In order to prepare for the transition, define all animation times
as milliseconds and adjust them when passing them to Tweener.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/663
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We can use that newer method where we don't care about the actual position
of an element inside the array.
(Array.includes() and Array.indexOf() do behave differently in edge cases,
for example in the handling of NaN, but those don't matter to us)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/152
Commit 8f15193b4 changed the `policy` property from a regular JS property to
a getter. This was necessary to avoid calling an overridden _createPolicy()
method before a subclass is properly initialized, but it broke the second
way of using notification sources:
Don't create a Source subclass, but use the base class directly and change
its `policy` property.
There's no good reason why we should no longer allow this, so add a setter.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/431
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkDirectionType. It's bit-compatible with it,
too. All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
Allow notifications to set a x-gnome-privacy-scope hint, with values in
['system', 'user']. If all the notifications in a particular source hint
that their privacy scope is ‘system’, don’t hide the notification
details on the lock screen.
This is aimed at fixing the particular case of power notifications: they
contain information which is not private to the user (it relates to the
system: battery state or AC state, which is obvious to anyone who can
see the machine), so hiding the details of a power management
notification when the screen is locked is pointless.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/726
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
We currently deliberately avoid chaining up in derived policy
constructors to not override properties with their defaults.
That's a neat trick that will stop working when porting to ES6
classes, as chaining up is necessary to actually initialize the
object there (including "this").
Address this by turning all properties into (overridable) getters
that are backed by private properties by default.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/350
The _createPolicy() method of a subclass usually depends on some
constructor parameters that need to be set before chaining up to
the parent. This works fine with Lang.Class, but will break with
ES6 classes, as "this" is only initialized after chaining up.
Prepare for this by not creating the policy in the constructor,
but when it is first accessed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/350
The intention of commit 4dc20398 was to disable unredirection while
banners are shown, but the ::done-displaying signal currently used for
re-enabling unredirection is only emitted under some circumstances, so
it's possible that unredirection is left disabled indefinitely, whoops.
Fix this by tying disabling unredirection explicitly to the lifetime
of the banner actor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/799
