When locking manually (or locking with an animation), fade the
screen to black after a small timeout. This provides a smoother
experience, instead of abruptly turning off the screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699112
Unfortunately, display configuration can and does fail, due
to unspecified HW constraints, drivers bugs, unsupported exotic
configurations or just bad luck.
So when the user makes a change in the control center, show
a dialog asking him if it looks OK, and revert back after 20 seconds
otherwise.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706208
All our modal dialogs are given a fixed width and grow vertically
as necessary. Set the request mode accordingly, so that wrapped
labels are considered correctly during size request, and not only
at allocation time (where they'll either take away from the padding
or even cause the dialog to overflow).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704015
The only point of using a custom container here was to prevent StBoxLayout
from enforcing the wrong request mode based on the orientation. With that
issue fixed, we can simplify the checkbox widget significantly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703811
With StBoxLayout using the Clutter layout manager, it will now respect
actors' expand/align properties. However for the change to be transparent,
we need to support the existing child meta properties as well. Do
this by simply translating them to the corresponding ClutterBoxChild
properties.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703810
With the BoxLayout containers in St and Mx and the ClutterBoxLayout
manager, we now have three more or less diverged implementations of
the same layout policy.
While removing StBoxLayout entirely in favor of ClutterLayoutManager
would be the fashionable thing to do, there are obvious drawbacks:
- it is the only actor we have that implements the scrollable interface
- it conveniently exposes its spacing property in CSS
- last but not least, it is used all over the place
So do the next best thing and make our implementation use the
Clutter layout manager internally - that way, the change is
transparent to users, while we get to refer most of the tricky
bits to Clutter. win-win!
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703810
Replace more direct XFixes usage with a the appropriate abstraction
API from mutter, which is guaranteed to work in wayland too.
It doesn't yet replace pointer position tracking, although probably
it should.
Also, because now we're using Mutter API, we lose the standalone
test case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705911
Mutter now includes an object with the same purpose and functionality
as ShellXFixesCursor, so we can replace our XFixes code with it
and work under wayland too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705911
Triangles should be flipped in RTL. This is the easiest way to do it that
doesn't rely on modifying the rotating logic, though it is a bit hacky since
the ClutterActor "scale-x" property technically considers the lower bound
to be 0. It works, though.
GrabHelpers use a 'captured-event' to steal events and emulate
modality or grab-like semantics. There can be issues when you try to
use multiple GrabHelpers stacked on each other. As Clutter follows
the DOM-like semantics of "first come, first serve", when a second
GrabHelper connects to 'captured-event', its callback will only be
processed *after* the first GrabHelper's callback is called.
This breaks the expectation of narrowing modality where new modals
take priority over the old ones.
Solving this globally in a cleaner manner would require a rewrite of
pushModal/GrabHelper. As a stopgap fix for now, use one shared
'captured-event' handler between all GrabHelper instances, and
delegate to the individual GrabHelpers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699272
This commit detects when a user inserts a smartcard,
and then initiates user verification using the gdm-smartcard
PAM service.
Likewise, if a user removes their smartcard, password verification
(or the user list depending on auth mode and configuration) are initiated
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
gnome-settings-daemon monitors smartcard insertion and removal
events on the system and then exports a model of the current
smartcard topology over the bus using the D-Bus ObjectManager interface.
This commit adds the support code needed in gnome-shell to talk to
the gnome-settings-daemon service.
A future commit will use this code to inform the login screen
when a user inserts a smartcard (so it can react appropriately)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
The D-Bus ObjectManager interface is fairly recent addition to the
D-Bus specification. Its purpose is to provide a standardized way
to track objects dynamically coming and going for a service, and
to track capabilities dynamically coming and going for those objects
(by means of interfaces).
This commit adds the requisite code needed to make use of the
ObjectManager interface.
It will ultimately be needed to implement smartcard support in the
login screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
The duplication makes the function look a lot more complicated
than it actually is.
This commit moves the common code to a new _startService function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Some pam modules prompt without expecting the user to type
an answer back (e.g. "Please swipe finger"). We need to
emit prompted in this case too, so the the dialog will get shown.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Currently, fingerprint authentication is always a secondary thing.
If a user wants to swipe their finger when the computer is asking
for a password, so be it.
This commit paves the way for making fingerprint auth optionally
be the main way to authenticate. Currently there's no way to enable
this, but in a future commit will honor
enable-password-authentication=false
in gsettings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Right now, the primary way a user logs in is with
a password. They can also swipe their finger, if their
fingerprint is enrolled, but it's expected the fingerprint
auth service won't ask questions the user has to respond to
by typing. As such, we ignore questions that comes from
anything but the main auth service: gdm-password.
In the future, if a user inserts a smartcard, we'll want
to treat the gdm-smartcard service as the main auth service,
and let any questions from it get to the user.
This commit tries to prepare for that eventuality by storing
the name of the default auth service away in a _defaultService variable
before verification has begun, and then later checking incoming
queries against that service instead of checking against
string 'gdm-password' directly.
Of course, right now, _defaultService is always gdm-password.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
This commit introduces a new BeginRequestType enum which gets
passed to the 'reset' signal to specify whether
a username should be provided to the begin() method and changes
the loginDialog to comply.
Currently, the signal only ever gets emitted with
AuthPrompt.BeginRequestType.PROVIDE_USERNAME
but that will change in the future when providing smartcard
support.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
We currently emit "failed" any time the UserVerifier is reset,
and user verification didn't succeed prior.
A more conceptually clear time to emit "failed" would be if
the UserVerifier is reset and user verification failed prior,
and to emit "failed" if the user cancels unlock.
This commit restructures things to do that. Aside from being
more conceptually clear, it also lays the groundwork for us
to be able to reset the unlock screen without failing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
authPrompt.reset() currently only leaves the authPrompt in a
sane state if the user isn't verifying.
This commit makes sure to cancel verification if a reset happens
while verification is in process.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
