We do want to update the best AP on strength change, in case we
can switch to a better one.
But even if we can't and the AP is unchanged, the icon should
be updated to reflect the change.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2414>
Only when part of it is actually visible.
Because the central rectangle is generally the largest part, this
eliminates most of the shadow's render time. For example, animating
`.workspace-background` by tapping Super, the shell's overall render
time is reduced about 15%.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1915>
There's no visible change here since we're just moving from the
default transparent black to transparent other. But the latter can
be used as a special value to indicate to the rendering code when a
background is expected to be always occluded.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1915>
Right now DeviceCategory is a small section wrapper that shows
a summary instead of its content if it contains too many items.
It will eventually eventually turn into the base class for
network device quick toggles. Who would have thought that
when it was added for the "there's a computer with 32 ethernet
cards" fringe case?!
For now, give it a more appropriate name and use device types
instead of our made-up categories, now that the two map neatly.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
It's odd to swap out a switch with a status label, and the
information isn't that helpful to begin with: It's either
transient (connecting, deactivating, ...), or too little to
be meaningful (unknown, failed, ...).
We're also perfectly happy to not show it in "label mode"
(i.e. when there's just one VPN).
Just get rid of it.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
Stop providing detailed state descriptions, instead use a name
that best represents the device at the moment (like a wifi SSID,
the carrier name, or the device name as determined by network manager).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
The _devices property is another case of overloading the
"device" term.
Fun fact:
this._devices[device._delegate.category].devices
uses three different meanings of "device" (section, NM.Device, item).
The devices array in sections won't be around for much longer,
but the property that tracks the sections is worth renaming.
While at it, use a map instead of a plain object, which has a
guaranteed order when iterating (which will come in handy later).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
Different access points can belong to the same wireless network. As
NetworkManager doesn't handle this for us, we need to track networks
ourselves, and we currently do this using ad-hoc object literals and
monkey-patching.
Clean this up by factoring out a proper WirelessNetwork class, and
associate them to items with a map.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
Interpreting the different flags is better left to the domain
experts at NetworkManager. It is also much more likely that
NM's own functions will handle newly added flags than our own
code.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
There is a straight mapping between running/enabled and visibility,
so bind them instead of using a signal handler.
_syncConnectivity() is called both from _syncMainConnection() and
on connectivity changes, which should cover any running/enabled
changes.
That just leaves updating the icon on state changes.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
We would want the signals to be disconnected if we ever happened to
destroy the indicator. Even if we don't, connectObject() is simply
nicer when connecting half a dozen handlers at once.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
There is only one case where we show a notification: When activating
a connection failed.
There is therefore no reason for a generic wrapper around the
notification API. Likewise, tracking the source is a bit pointless,
given that the notification is transient. In fact, as we destroy
an existing notification *before* checking for the source, any
previous source will be gone by that point.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
The function is a handler for the `notify::state` handler, so
the state and reason parameters used in the checks are always
undefined.
In addition, `DEACTIVATED` is not (just) a failure state. We
clearly don't want to complain about a failed connection when
the change happened on request of the user.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
We never used it, so after more than ten years, it seems safe to
assume that we never will.
Plus different items pass different types, which makes it pretty
much impossible to use, even if we wanted to (which apparently
we don't 🤷️)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
When deciding on whether to show the 'no-route' icon, we check
for the client's connectivity *and* whether the devices's active
connection is used as primary connection.
This is currently masked by the indicator updating the icon on
connection changes anyway, but items should still notify the
change themselves.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
The wireless device item tracks the active access point in order
to update its icon on signal strength changes.
However we currently don't synchronize the initial state, so we
miss strength changes until the first access-point change.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
Otherwise any unrelated errors in that function are hidden,
because exceptions in async functions are turned into promise
rejections (and JS cannot know that we won't handle it at a later
point).
It wouldn't happen to me of course 😉
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
I wasn't genuiously going to touch those lines, but I ran into
a limitation of the run-eslint script:
It currently bases changed lines on a diff between HEAD and main
instead of the commit-by-commit log.
The two can vary quite a bit when shuffling code around, and those
are the lines the tool kept complaining about.
I'll look into improving the script, but for now it's quicker to
just shut it up by fixing up the complaints.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2406>
There isn't always a serviceName when we set a message. Furthermore we
are passing the serviceName only to decide if we want to wiggle or not.
Pass the wiggle parameters instead. If they are missing, we don't want
to wiggle.
This fixes the following error:
JS ERROR: Exception in callback for signal: login-format-changed: Error: Wrong type number; string expected
setMessage@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/authPrompt.js:542:13
_showRealmLoginHint@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/loginDialog.js:931:26
_emit@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/_signals.js:114:47
_updateLoginFormat@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/realmd.js:85:18
_reloadRealm@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/realmd.js:57:14
_onRealmLoaded@resource:///org/gnome/shell/gdm/realmd.js:64:14
_makeProxyWrapper/</<@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/core/overrides/Gio.js:245:34
Fallout from 526f0711f1.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/5547
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2404>
Now that the old system menu has been ported over, we can move
the power toggle to its intended place. The main difference to
the stand-alone toggle is that the button now uses its natural
size rather than the fixed size of regular quick items.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2393>
This port is a bit messier than the previous ones, because the
existing menu section translates less directly to the new UI,
which uses a row of individual toggles for settings, lock and
shutdown.
In order to not complicate the grid layout further by supporting
rows with a different number of columns than the overall grid and
children at their natural size, create a custom, non-reactive
SystemItem item that spans an entire row, and contains the individual
toggles.
This works quite well, even with the shutdown item that uses a menu
for the various actions.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2393>
