We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
When plugging in a device with sensors that are unsupported by
iio-sensor-proxy, the proxy may quit so fast that the name disappears
from the bus before we get to construct the SensorProxy in response
to the name-appeared handler, resulting in the following warning:
JS ERROR: TypeError: this._sensorProxy is null
_sensorProxyAppeared/this._sensorProxy<@resource:///org/gnome/shell/misc/systemActions.js:217:17
_makeProxyWrapper/</<@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/overrides/Gio.js:243:21
Address this by creating the proxy unconditionally instead of monitoring
the bus name, and using the g-name-owner property to determine whether
iio-sensor-proxy is active.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1357
For GObject properties, we follow the convention of all-lowercase,
dash-separated names. Those translate to underscores in getters/setters,
so exempt them from the newly added "camelcase" rule.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent on whether case labels share the same
indentation level as the corresponding switch statement or not. gjs
goes with the default of no additional indentation, so go along with
that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
Starting an object literal with a comment throws off eslint's rules
for brace style (newline between brace and properties for both opening
and closing brace or neither) as well as indentation (fixed four-space
indent or align with the previous argument).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
Our search for system actions is currently inconsistent with searching
for applications: While we match terms anywhere within keywords, GIO
will only match at the beginning of words.
In order to get the same behavior, split keywords into single words
and only match terms at the beginning of a word.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/745
Every action has specific associated terms that
identify that action and show it in the search
results. Methods to match the actions as well
as getting properties of specific actions are
needed in order to provide a way of using the
actions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691900
We want to be able to search for available system actions, so
rather than tracking each action in a separate property, store
them in a single map that can be searched in a generic and clean
way.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691900
In anticipation of showing the system actions in
the search results, it is fit to move action
specific code to its own module in order to
reuse it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691900
