Extensions are currently enabled or disabled by directly changing the
list in the 'enabled-extensions' GSettings key. As we will soon add
an overriding 'disabled-extensions' key as well, it makes sense to
offer explicit API for enabling/disabling to avoid duplicating the
logic.
For the corresponding D-Bus API, the methods were even mentioned in
the GSettings schema, albeit unimplemented until now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789852
While public methods to enable/disable extensions make sense for an
extension manager, the existing ones are only used internally. Make
them private and rename them, so that we can re-use the current
names for more useful public methods.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789852
The extension system started out as a set of simple functions, but
gained more state later, and even some hacks to emit signals without
having an object to emit them on.
There is no good reason for that weirdness, so rather than imitating an
object, wrap the existing system into a real ExtensionManager object.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789852
It makes sense to keep extension-related enums in the same module instead
of spreading them between ExtensionSystem and ExtensionUtils.
More importantly, this will make the type available to the extensions-prefs
tool (which runs in a different process and therefore only has access to
a limited set of modules).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789852
Since -Werror=missing-braces is used, having missing braces warnings
aren't allowed. However, the first member of struct sigaction is a union
whose first member is a pointer, causing clang to produce warnings when
it is initialized to { 0 }.
Instead of initializing to a zero value, we can specify values of
members directly in the initializer to avoid warnings.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/633
Commit bd18313d12 changed to a new naming scheme for battery icons,
and used to old icon names as fallback-icon-name for compatibility
with older/other icon themes.
However that fallback code isn't working correctly, as GThemedIcon's
default fallbacks will transform a name of `battery-level-90-symbolic`
to a list of names:
- `battery-level-90-symbolic`
- `battery-level-symbolic`
- `battery-symbolic`
The last one frequently exists, so instead of the intended fallback,
we end up with a generic battery icon.
Address this by specifying the icon as GIcon instead of an icon-name,
where we have more control over how the icon is resolved.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1442
Glib stopped providing any fallback implementations on systems without
memmove() all the way back in 2013. Since then, the symbol is a simple
macro around memmove(); use that function directly now that glib added
a deprecation warning.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/632
Just as we did for the workspace switcher popup, support workspaces
being laid out in a single row in the window picker.
Note that this takes care of the various workspace switch actions in
the overview (scrolling, panning, touch(pad) gestures) as well as the
switch animation, but not of the overview's workspace switcher component.
There are currently no plans to support other layouts there, as the
component is inherently vertical (in fact, it was the whole reason for
switching the layout in the first place).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/575
While mutter supports a variety of different grid layouts (n columns/rows,
growing vertically or horizontally from any of the four corners), we
hardcode a fixed vertical layout of a single column.
Now that mutter exposes the actual layout to us, add support for a more
traditional horizontal layout as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/575
Extension preferences Application class is just a container for a GtkApplication
so instead of using composition we can inherit from the base GObject class.
Also replace signal connections with vfunc's.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/631
In some cases the style-changed signal hasn't been emitted when
_computeLayout() is called, resulting in the use of the default spacing
and item size values for the calculations.
One case where this happens is when starting a search. Right after the
initialization of GridSearchResults, _computeLayout() is called from
_getMaxDisplayedResults() and the style-changed signal hasn't been
emitted yet. The computed layout will be wrong and the maximum
number of results will also be wrong.
To prevent this from happening, make sure the style has been updated
before doing the calculations in _computeLayout().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/110
The calculation of how many results can be shown in GridSearchResults is
broken: The width of the parent container (resultsView.actor) we're
using as the maximum width right now is the width of the scrollView of
SearchResults (which always expands to the whole screen size). This
width will only be correct if the scrollView (ie. the whole screen) is
smaller than the max width of searchResultsContent, which only is the
case for screens smaller than 1000px.
To fix the calculation, use the width of our own actor and don't get it
using clutter_actor_get_width(), but using the last allocation of the
actor. This way we don't get the preferred width if the actor is not
allocated at this point (it's hidden by _ensureProviderDisplay() when
starting a new search).
Then, when the allocation of the actor changes, rebuild the grid search
results by calling updateSearch() with the old arguments to ensure the
number of visible results is correct. The fact that we're only listening
for allocation changes here is the reason why we never want to use the
preferred width of the actor inside _getMaxDisplayedResults(): While
the actor is hidden clutter_actor_get_width() would return the preferred
width, which we'd then use the as the maximum width. But if the actor
had a correct allocation before, no notify::allocation signal will be
emitted when the actor is shown again because the allocation is still
the same, and we'll end up using the preferred width as maximium width
forever.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/110
Unlike the app grid, we show the search results while the dash is hidden
and with a small scrollbar instead of page indicator dots. This
means there's nothing the search results might horizontally overlap
with and the padding here is unneccessary.
The spacing between the search results and the screen edges is still
sufficient because of the paddings applied to searchResultsContent.
On very small screens (< 1000px), this allows the search results to
utilize a lot more of the horizontal screen space.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/110
The functionality the searchResultsBin container provides can easily be
moved into a subclass of St.BoxLayout, no need for an additional StBin.
The "searchResultsBin" css class isn't used in the stylesheets either.
Same with the scrollChild container.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/110
Object.prototype.hasOwnProperty() is more precise than checking for
falsiness, for instance the following is true:
{ foo: undefined }.hasOwnProperty('foo');
However when checking for a handler ID, a more relaxed check is more
appropriate, as particularly 0 is not a valid handler ID.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/626
Regarding coding style, gjs is moving in a direction that departs quite
significantly from the established style, in particular when indenting
multi-line array/object literals or method arguments:
Currently we are keeping those elements aligned, while the gjs rules now
expect them to use the regular 4-space indentation.
There are certainly good arguments that can be made for that move - it's
much less prone to leading to overly-long lines, and matches popluar JS
styles elsewhere. But switching coding style implies large diffs which
interfere with git-blame and friends, so in order to allow for a more
gradual change, add a separate set of "legacy" rules that match more
closely the style we would expect up to now.
It also disables the rules for quotes and template strings - the former
because we cannot match the current style to use double-quotes for
translatable strings and single-quotes otherwise, the latter because
template strings are still relatively new, so we haven't adopted them
yet.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/609
All variables should be in camelCase, so configure the corresponding
rule to enforce this. Exempt properties for now, to accommodate the
existing practice of using C-style underscore names for construct
properties of introspected objects.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/609
We replaced all Lang.bind() calls with arrow functions or the standardized
Function.prototype.bind(), at least for the former eslint has some options
to ensure that the old custom doesn't sneak back in.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/609
gjs doesn't include any gettext wrappers, and obviously can't know
about the shell's global object, so include those in the list of
globals for all sources in the gnome-shell context.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/609
gjs started to run eslint during its CI a while ago, so there is an
existing rules set we can use as a starting point for our own setup.
As we will adapt those rules to our code base, we don't want those
changes to make it harder to synchronize the copy with future gjs
changes, so include the rules from a separate file rather than using
the configuration directly.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/609
For some reason, people are still seeing those after commit d5ebd8c8.
While this is something we really should figure out, we can work around
the issue by keeping the view actors hidden until the update is complete.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1065
Window previews are sometimes shown translucent, for example during
drags or animations. They can also have attached dialogs, in which
case the opacity should affect the combination of all windows instead
of being applied to each window individually, blended together, so
make sure they are redirected as a whole when necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/774
Whether people love or hate the hot corner depends in large extents
on hardware sensitivity and habits, which is hard to get right
universally. So bite the bullet and support an option to enable or
disable hot corners ...
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688320
