When extracting the sliced image, the GTask grants data ownership on
g_task_propagate_*, so the pixbuf list must be properly freed. On async
load, we just left a dangling reference when returning on the async
task.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642652
Since the workarea and margins are both in pysical pixels dimensions (we
fetch margins from Clutter, not from the theme), but the CSS expects
logical (scaled) pixels, unless we consider the scale factor when
setting max-height, it won't work on a HiDpi display.
This fixes missing scrollbars when the calendar popup is full on HiDpi
displays.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753305
Generalizing menu toggling via keyboard in commit 1d58ea25ab
fixed keynav in many places, but it turns out that it also adds
unexpected interactions in some cases where the source is not
button-like, as for example the entry context menus provided by
ShellEntry. Commit e33c68a415 fixed one case, however it is still
possible for plain enter/space to unexpectedly trigger the menu
if the entry itself doesn't consume the event, which is the case
when ClutterText:editable is false. However for a general fix, it
makes more sense to consider the source actor's :reactive property
and disable toggling menus via keyboard when they cannot be toggled
by pointer either - expecting non-editable entries to be non-reactive
as well seems like a reasonable assumption, and indeed all our code
follows that pattern.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758873
Instead of using directories that we'll destroy when done, use the new
"ephemeral" data manager feature, through the JavaScript version of:
webkit_web_context_new_ephemeral()
We also throw an error on startup, in the logs, if WebKitGTK is too old.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780453
st_theme_node_get_border_image() may return %NULL, leading to a
segfault in st_border_image_get_file() when glib is compiled with
G_DISABLE_CHECKS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780381
Our weather integration should follow GNOME Weather as closely as
possible, which means that we should respect its location permission
rather than using our own or none at all (which we can as a "system"
component and as geoclue's authorization agent).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252
It doesn't make sense to tie the proxy code for flatpak's permission
store to the location indicator, just because that was the first
component to use it, so split it into a separate module.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252
The setting to globally disable location settings altogether isn't
handled by the geoclue service itself, but by the authorization
agent. This means that:
- it doesn't apply to system components
(which gnome-shell is now considered[0])
- it doesn't apply once the geoclue connection
has been authorized
However users can reasonably expect that we won't use location services
after they disabled them, so handle the setting explicitly.
[0] https://cgit.freedesktop.org/geoclue/commit/?id=a4cef6c0ad08https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252
We currently use automatic location for weather forecasts if the
corresponding Weather setting is set, however we should take other
factors into account as well:
- whether location services are enabled at all
- whether Weather has been authorized to use them
In preparation of these changes, track the setting's value in a
separate property and make _useAutoLocation a getter, so we can
extend it with additional conditions easily.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252
Setting GWeatherInfo:location to null helpfully doesn't mean
"no location", but "NYC". This obviously isn't what we want
to show users, so track the location validity separately and
consider it when updating the label shown to users.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780252
When using the 'disable-lock-screen' setting to lock down the screen
lock, the expectation is that users cannot lock the screen. However
as it turns out, all the setting currently does is hiding the lock
button in the system menu and making the lock settings in the privacy
panel inactive. That means that if the 'lock-screen-enabled' setting
isn't disabled and locked down as well, we will just continue to
lock the screen on inactivity - not to mention the keyboard shortcut
that isn't subject to that setting anyway.
Instead of expecting administrators to hunt down every possible way
of locking the screen and disabling it individually, we can easily
handle all cases by refusing to lock the screen when disabled by the
lockdown settings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780212
